Illumina, Inc. et al v. QIAGEN, N.V. et al
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY by Hon. William Alsup granting 82 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2016)
1 John L. Cooper (SBN 50324)
jcooper@fbm.com
2 Jeffrey M. Fisher (SBN 155284)
jfisher@fbm.com
3 Winston Liaw (State Bar No. 273899)
wliaw@fbm.com
4 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
5 San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 954-4400
6 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480
Edward R. Reines (SBN 135960)
edward.reines@weil.com
Derek C. Walter (SBN 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Illumina, Inc. and
Illumina Cambridge Ltd.
7 Attorneys for Defendants QIAGEN, N.V.,
QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc.,
8 QIAGEN Sciences, LLC, QIAGEN Inc. (USA),
QIAGEN Redwood City, Inc., and
9 Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
ILLUMINA, INC., and ILLUMINA
14 CAMBRIDGE LTD.,
15
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND JURISDICTIONAL
DISCOVERY
16
v.
22
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016, defendants except for QIAGEN N.V. filed a motion to
24
WHEREAS, on June 16, 2016, defendant QIAGEN N.V. filed a motion to dismiss for lack
26
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2016, the Court (i) held in abeyance QIAGEN N.V.’s motion to
17 QIAGEN N.V., QIAGEN GmbH,
QIAGEN GAITHERSBURG, INC.,
18 QIAGEN SCIENCES, LLC,
QIAGEN INC. (USA), QIAGEN REDWOOD
19 CITY, INC., and INTELLIGENT BIOSYSTEMS, INC.,
20
Defendants.
21
23 transfer this matter to the District of Delaware [Dkt. No. 29];
25 of personal jurisdiction [Dkt. No. 31];
27 dismiss, pending supplemental expedited jurisdictional discovery, (ii) ordered expedited
28
1
Stip. and [Proposed] Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer, and Jurisdictional Discovery.: Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA
1 jurisdictional discovery and further briefing, and (iii) denied the motion to transfer or stay,
2 reserving on a final determination on the issue until after jurisdictional discovery was concluded
3 and the personal jurisdiction issue regarding QIAGEN N.V. was resolved [Dkt. No. 64];
4
WHEREAS, while QIAGEN N.V. does not believe it has sufficient contacts with
5 California or the United States for general or specific personal jurisdiction, due to and to avoid the
6 further burden and expense of continued, expedited jurisdictional discovery in this case, QIAGEN
7 N.V. thereby has offered to withdraw its motion to dismiss and submit to the jurisdiction of this
8 Court for the limited purpose of this particular case;
9
WHEREAS, while plaintiffs believe this Court has personal jurisdiction over QIAGEN
10 N.V. and contested QIAGEN N.V.'s motion to dismiss, they support the final resolution of the
11 personal jurisdiction issue in this case by stipulation and without the need for further Court
12 involvement.
13
NOW THEREFORE, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, subject to the
15
1.
QIAGEN N.V. withdraws its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in
17
2.
Plaintiffs withdraw their jurisdictional discovery requests served on QIAGEN
14 approval and order of the Court, as follows:
16 this case [Dkt. No. 31].
18 N.V., namely Plaintiffs’ Jurisdictional Discovery Document Requests to QIAGEN N.V. (Nos. 119 12); Plaintiffs’ Jurisdictional Discovery Interrogatories to QIAGEN N.V. (Nos. 1-12); and
20 Plaintiffs' requests for jurisdictional discovery depositions.
21
3.
QIAGEN N.V. withdraws its motion to dismiss with the understanding that there
22 will be no supplement to the current record and the Court’s interim order denying the motion to
23 transfer can become final.
24
4.
In light of this stipulation, there is no need for further jurisdictional discovery or
26
5.
The parties shall bear their own fees and costs.
25 briefing, or for the jurisdictional hearing set for October 13, 2016.
27
28
2
Stip. and [Proposed] Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer, and Jurisdictional Discovery.: Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3 Dated: July 31, 2016
4 I, John L. Cooper, represent that
concurrence in the filing of this document
5 has been obtained from each of the other
signatories, which shall serve in lieu of
6 their signatures on this document.
7
8
9
10
Attorneys For Defendants
QIAGEN, N.V., QIAGEN GMBH, QIAGEN
GAITHERSBURG, INC., QIAGEN SCIENCES,
LLC, QIAGEN INC. (USA), QIAGEN
REDWOOD CITY, INC., AND INTELLIGENT
BIO-SYSTEMS, INC.
/s/ Edward R. Reines
Edward R. Reines
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ILLUMINA, INC. AND ILLUMINA
CAMBRIDGE LTD.
14
15
17
/s/ John L. Cooper
John L. Cooper
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
11
16
FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing set for October 13,
18 2016 is hereby taken off the calendar.
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: ___________________
August 1, 2016.
23
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stip. and [Proposed] Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer, and Jurisdictional Discovery.: Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?