Illumina, Inc. et al v. QIAGEN, N.V. et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY by Hon. William Alsup granting 82 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 John L. Cooper (SBN 50324) jcooper@fbm.com 2 Jeffrey M. Fisher (SBN 155284) jfisher@fbm.com 3 Winston Liaw (State Bar No. 273899) wliaw@fbm.com 4 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 6 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Edward R. Reines (SBN 135960) edward.reines@weil.com Derek C. Walter (SBN 246322) derek.walter@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Illumina, Inc. and Illumina Cambridge Ltd. 7 Attorneys for Defendants QIAGEN, N.V., QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc., 8 QIAGEN Sciences, LLC, QIAGEN Inc. (USA), QIAGEN Redwood City, Inc., and 9 Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 ILLUMINA, INC., and ILLUMINA 14 CAMBRIDGE LTD., 15 Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY 16 v. 22 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016, defendants except for QIAGEN N.V. filed a motion to 24 WHEREAS, on June 16, 2016, defendant QIAGEN N.V. filed a motion to dismiss for lack 26 WHEREAS, on July 19, 2016, the Court (i) held in abeyance QIAGEN N.V.’s motion to 17 QIAGEN N.V., QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN GAITHERSBURG, INC., 18 QIAGEN SCIENCES, LLC, QIAGEN INC. (USA), QIAGEN REDWOOD 19 CITY, INC., and INTELLIGENT BIOSYSTEMS, INC., 20 Defendants. 21 23 transfer this matter to the District of Delaware [Dkt. No. 29]; 25 of personal jurisdiction [Dkt. No. 31]; 27 dismiss, pending supplemental expedited jurisdictional discovery, (ii) ordered expedited 28 1 Stip. and [Proposed] Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer, and Jurisdictional Discovery.: Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA 1 jurisdictional discovery and further briefing, and (iii) denied the motion to transfer or stay, 2 reserving on a final determination on the issue until after jurisdictional discovery was concluded 3 and the personal jurisdiction issue regarding QIAGEN N.V. was resolved [Dkt. No. 64]; 4 WHEREAS, while QIAGEN N.V. does not believe it has sufficient contacts with 5 California or the United States for general or specific personal jurisdiction, due to and to avoid the 6 further burden and expense of continued, expedited jurisdictional discovery in this case, QIAGEN 7 N.V. thereby has offered to withdraw its motion to dismiss and submit to the jurisdiction of this 8 Court for the limited purpose of this particular case; 9 WHEREAS, while plaintiffs believe this Court has personal jurisdiction over QIAGEN 10 N.V. and contested QIAGEN N.V.'s motion to dismiss, they support the final resolution of the 11 personal jurisdiction issue in this case by stipulation and without the need for further Court 12 involvement. 13 NOW THEREFORE, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, subject to the 15 1. QIAGEN N.V. withdraws its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in 17 2. Plaintiffs withdraw their jurisdictional discovery requests served on QIAGEN 14 approval and order of the Court, as follows: 16 this case [Dkt. No. 31]. 18 N.V., namely Plaintiffs’ Jurisdictional Discovery Document Requests to QIAGEN N.V. (Nos. 119 12); Plaintiffs’ Jurisdictional Discovery Interrogatories to QIAGEN N.V. (Nos. 1-12); and 20 Plaintiffs' requests for jurisdictional discovery depositions. 21 3. QIAGEN N.V. withdraws its motion to dismiss with the understanding that there 22 will be no supplement to the current record and the Court’s interim order denying the motion to 23 transfer can become final. 24 4. In light of this stipulation, there is no need for further jurisdictional discovery or 26 5. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. 25 briefing, or for the jurisdictional hearing set for October 13, 2016. 27 28 2 Stip. and [Proposed] Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer, and Jurisdictional Discovery.: Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 Dated: July 31, 2016 4 I, John L. Cooper, represent that concurrence in the filing of this document 5 has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of 6 their signatures on this document. 7 8 9 10 Attorneys For Defendants QIAGEN, N.V., QIAGEN GMBH, QIAGEN GAITHERSBURG, INC., QIAGEN SCIENCES, LLC, QIAGEN INC. (USA), QIAGEN REDWOOD CITY, INC., AND INTELLIGENT BIO-SYSTEMS, INC. /s/ Edward R. Reines Edward R. Reines 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ILLUMINA, INC. AND ILLUMINA CAMBRIDGE LTD. 14 15 17 /s/ John L. Cooper John L. Cooper WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 11 16 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing set for October 13, 18 2016 is hereby taken off the calendar. 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: ___________________ August 1, 2016. 23 THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stip. and [Proposed] Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer, and Jurisdictional Discovery.: Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?