Sauer v. Lateef Investment Management, LP et al

Filing 8

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 79-5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/26/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MATTHEW F. SAUER, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-02802-JSC v. LATEEF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LP, et al., Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 79-5 Re: Dkt. No. 7 12 13 Plaintiff filed this civil action on May 24, 2016. A day later, Defendants filed a letter 14 requesting that the Court provisionally seal the complaint based on confidentiality concerns. 15 (Dkt. No. 7.) Civil Local Rule 79-5 outlines the procedure for sealing and identifies “sealable” 16 documents as those which contain information that is “privileged, protectable as a trade secret or 17 otherwise entitled to protection under the law.” Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). Defendants shall file an 18 administrative motion to file under seal in accordance with Rule 79-5(d) on or before June 2, 19 2016. Any such request should be “narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material.” Civ. 20 L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(B). Any opposition shall be filed within 4 days in accordance with Local Rule 7- 21 11(b). The Court will take the matter under submission upon receipt of the opposition and notify 22 the parties if oral argument is necessary. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2016 25 26 27 28 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?