Jacinto v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
Filing
44
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. The hearing on defendants' Motion to Dismiss is vacated, and plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause, in writing and no later than September 7, 2016, why the opposition should not be stricken. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 24, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MODESTA JACINTO,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 16-cv-02815-MMC
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC.; NATIONAL DEFAULT
SERVICING CORPORATION;
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;
VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO
DISMISS
Defendants.
13
14
15
Before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint,” filed July 12,
16
2016, by defendants Ditech Financial LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration
17
Systems, Inc.,1 and noticed for hearing on September 2, 2016.
18
On August 10, 2016, plaintiff Modesta Jacinto filed opposition thereto. As
19
defendants point out in their reply, however, plaintiff’s opposition is untimely, having been
20
filed almost a full month after the filing date of defendants’ motion. See Civil L.R. 7-3(a)
21
(providing “opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion
22
was filed”).
23
24
Accordingly, the hearing on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby VACATED
and plaintiff is hereby Ordered to Show Cause, in writing and no later than September 7,
25
26
27
28
1
On April 28, 2016, defendant National Default Servicing Corporation filed a
Declaration of Non-Monetary Status, by which it agreed to be bound by any nonmonetary order or judgment, and, on May 26, 2016, pursuant to stipulation, defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. was dismissed from the action.
1
2
3
2016, why the opposition should not be stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 24, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?