Collabrx, Inc. v. The Jackson Laboratory

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 on Briefing Schedule and Initial Case Management Conference filed by The Jackson Laboratory re 40 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [REDACTED]. Responses due by 12/2/2016. Replies due b y 12/20/2016. Motion Hearing set for 1/12/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 2/2/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/14/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Jeffrey W. Shopoff (Bar No. 46278)
Gregory S. Cavallo (Bar No. 173270)
James M. Robinson (Bar No. 238063)
SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Andrew N. Thomases (Bar No. 177339)
Henry Y. Huang (Bar No. 252832)
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Christine Ezzell Singer (pro hac vice)
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
COLLABRX, INC.

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant,
THE JACKSON LABORATORY

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

)
COLLABRX, INC., a Delaware corporation, )
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a Maine )
non-profit corporation,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC

STIPULATION

1
2
3

Plaintiff CollabRx, Inc. (“CollabRx”) and Defendant The Jackson Laboratory (“JAX”),
through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:

4

WHEREAS, on August 29, 2016, CollabRx filed its First Amended Complaint;

5

WHEREAS, on October 28, 2016, JAX filed a motion to dismiss CollabRx’s First

6

Amended Complaint, with a response due by November 14, 2016, a reply due by November 21,

7

2016, and a hearing date of December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 40);

8
9

WHEREAS, the Court has currently set the initial case management conference for
December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 43);

10

WHEREAS, due to the parties’ respective schedules for December and the potential

11

efficiency of allowing the Court time to resolve JAX’s motion to dismiss before proceeding

12

with the initial case management conference and corresponding pretrial and discovery

13

deadlines, the parties have agreed to extend the time for briefing and hearing on JAX’s motion

14

to dismiss and the initial case management conference;

15

WHEREAS, two prior time modifications have been requested and entered in this case

16

(ECF Nos. 19, 38), no case schedule has been entered, and the parties’ agreed time

17

modifications would not affect any case schedule other than continuing the initial case

18

management conference;

19

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate,

20

subject to the Court’s approval, that: (1) CollabRx’s response to JAX’s motion to dismiss be due

21

December 2, 2016; (2) JAX’s reply be due December 20, 2016; (3) the hearing on JAX’s

22

motion to dismiss be continued to January 12, 2016; and (4) the initial case management

23

conference be continued to February 9, 2016.

24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC

1

Dated: November 10, 2016

By

2
3

/s/ Gregory S. Cavallo
Gregory S. Cavallo
SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COLLABRX, INC.
/s/ Andrew Thomases
Andrew Thomases
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
THE JACKSON LABORATORY

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

11

20

S

ER

H

19

RT

18

R NIA

NO

17

FO

16

ERED

ORD
_______________________________
T IS SO
I
Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

LI

15

11/14/16

Dated: __________________________

UNIT
ED

14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

13

[PROPOSED] ORDER

A

12

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC