Collabrx, Inc. v. The Jackson Laboratory
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 on Briefing Schedule and Initial Case Management Conference filed by The Jackson Laboratory re 40 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [REDACTED]. Responses due by 12/2/2016. Replies due b y 12/20/2016. Motion Hearing set for 1/12/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 2/2/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/14/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jeffrey W. Shopoff (Bar No. 46278)
Gregory S. Cavallo (Bar No. 173270)
James M. Robinson (Bar No. 238063)
SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 984-1975
Facsimile: (415) 984-1978
Andrew N. Thomases (Bar No. 177339)
Henry Y. Huang (Bar No. 252832)
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
Tel: (650) 617-4000
Fax: (650) 617-4090
Christine Ezzell Singer (pro hac vice)
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: (212) 596-9208
Fax: (212) 596-9090
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
COLLABRX, INC.
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant,
THE JACKSON LABORATORY
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
COLLABRX, INC., a Delaware corporation, )
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a Maine )
non-profit corporation,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC
STIPULATION
1
2
3
Plaintiff CollabRx, Inc. (“CollabRx”) and Defendant The Jackson Laboratory (“JAX”),
through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:
4
WHEREAS, on August 29, 2016, CollabRx filed its First Amended Complaint;
5
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2016, JAX filed a motion to dismiss CollabRx’s First
6
Amended Complaint, with a response due by November 14, 2016, a reply due by November 21,
7
2016, and a hearing date of December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 40);
8
9
WHEREAS, the Court has currently set the initial case management conference for
December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 43);
10
WHEREAS, due to the parties’ respective schedules for December and the potential
11
efficiency of allowing the Court time to resolve JAX’s motion to dismiss before proceeding
12
with the initial case management conference and corresponding pretrial and discovery
13
deadlines, the parties have agreed to extend the time for briefing and hearing on JAX’s motion
14
to dismiss and the initial case management conference;
15
WHEREAS, two prior time modifications have been requested and entered in this case
16
(ECF Nos. 19, 38), no case schedule has been entered, and the parties’ agreed time
17
modifications would not affect any case schedule other than continuing the initial case
18
management conference;
19
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate,
20
subject to the Court’s approval, that: (1) CollabRx’s response to JAX’s motion to dismiss be due
21
December 2, 2016; (2) JAX’s reply be due December 20, 2016; (3) the hearing on JAX’s
22
motion to dismiss be continued to January 12, 2016; and (4) the initial case management
23
conference be continued to February 9, 2016.
24
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC
1
Dated: November 10, 2016
By
2
3
/s/ Gregory S. Cavallo
Gregory S. Cavallo
SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COLLABRX, INC.
/s/ Andrew Thomases
Andrew Thomases
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
THE JACKSON LABORATORY
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.
11
20
S
ER
H
19
RT
18
R NIA
NO
17
FO
16
ERED
ORD
_______________________________
T IS SO
I
Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
LI
15
11/14/16
Dated: __________________________
UNIT
ED
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
A
12
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?