Collabrx, Inc. v. The Jackson Laboratory

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 on Briefing Schedule and Initial Case Management Conference filed by The Jackson Laboratory re 40 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [REDACTED]. Responses due by 12/2/2016. Replies due b y 12/20/2016. Motion Hearing set for 1/12/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 2/2/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/14/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jeffrey W. Shopoff (Bar No. 46278) Gregory S. Cavallo (Bar No. 173270) James M. Robinson (Bar No. 238063) SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-1975 Facsimile: (415) 984-1978 Andrew N. Thomases (Bar No. 177339) Henry Y. Huang (Bar No. 252832) ROPES & GRAY LLP 1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284 Tel: (650) 617-4000 Fax: (650) 617-4090 Christine Ezzell Singer (pro hac vice) ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Tel: (212) 596-9208 Fax: (212) 596-9090 Attorneys for Plaintiff, COLLABRX, INC. 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant, THE JACKSON LABORATORY 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) COLLABRX, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a Maine ) non-profit corporation, ) ) ) Defendant. ) Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC STIPULATION 1 2 3 Plaintiff CollabRx, Inc. (“CollabRx”) and Defendant The Jackson Laboratory (“JAX”), through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that: 4 WHEREAS, on August 29, 2016, CollabRx filed its First Amended Complaint; 5 WHEREAS, on October 28, 2016, JAX filed a motion to dismiss CollabRx’s First 6 Amended Complaint, with a response due by November 14, 2016, a reply due by November 21, 7 2016, and a hearing date of December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 40); 8 9 WHEREAS, the Court has currently set the initial case management conference for December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 43); 10 WHEREAS, due to the parties’ respective schedules for December and the potential 11 efficiency of allowing the Court time to resolve JAX’s motion to dismiss before proceeding 12 with the initial case management conference and corresponding pretrial and discovery 13 deadlines, the parties have agreed to extend the time for briefing and hearing on JAX’s motion 14 to dismiss and the initial case management conference; 15 WHEREAS, two prior time modifications have been requested and entered in this case 16 (ECF Nos. 19, 38), no case schedule has been entered, and the parties’ agreed time 17 modifications would not affect any case schedule other than continuing the initial case 18 management conference; 19 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, 20 subject to the Court’s approval, that: (1) CollabRx’s response to JAX’s motion to dismiss be due 21 December 2, 2016; (2) JAX’s reply be due December 20, 2016; (3) the hearing on JAX’s 22 motion to dismiss be continued to January 12, 2016; and (4) the initial case management 23 conference be continued to February 9, 2016. 24 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 1 Dated: November 10, 2016 By 2 3 /s/ Gregory S. Cavallo Gregory S. Cavallo SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff COLLABRX, INC. /s/ Andrew Thomases Andrew Thomases ROPES & GRAY LLP Attorneys for Defendant THE JACKSON LABORATORY 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 11 20 S ER H 19 RT 18 R NIA NO 17 FO 16 ERED ORD _______________________________ T IS SO I Edward M. Chen United States District Judge n M. Che Edward Judge LI 15 11/14/16 Dated: __________________________ UNIT ED 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER A 12 N D IS T IC T R OF C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?