Marcus v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 29

SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 08/08/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GEORGE MARCUS, 9 Plaintiff, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Case No. 16-cv-02871-MMC SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS Defendants. 13 14 On August 1, 2017, plaintiff electronically filed his "Motion for Relief." Plaintiff has 15 violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by 16 failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed 17 . . . marked 'Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For 18 Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. 19 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District 20 and the Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the 21 above-referenced document. 22 The Court has previously advised plaintiff of his failure to comply with the Civil 23 Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders in connection with earlier-filed 24 documents. (See Order, filed August 15, 2016.) Such reminder appears to have had 25 little to no effect on compelling compliance therewith. 26 Parties are expected to comply with court rules without repeated reminders. 27 Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby advised that the Court will impose sanctions, including, but 28 not limited to, striking from the record any further electronically filed document for which a 1 chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: August 8, 2017 6 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?