Wycinsky v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 21

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of City of Richmond, Christopher Magnus against Jonathan Wycinsky. To the extent that the above-titled action is brought against the City, the action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule12(b)(6).Plaintiffs claims against Magnus are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m). (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2016)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
JONATHAN WYCINSKY,
No. CV-16-2873 MMC

6
7

Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

8

v.

9
CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,
10
Defendants.
/

11
12

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
13

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
14

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The
15

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
16

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
17

To the extent that the above-titled action is brought against the City, the action is
18

hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule12(b)(6).
19

Plaintiff’s claims against Magnus are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice,
20

pursuant to Rule 4(m).
21
22
23

Dated: October 3, 2016

Susan Y. Soong, Clerk

24
25

By: Tracy Lucero
Deputy Clerk

26
27
28