Wycinsky v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 09/18/2017. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 GEORGE MARCUS, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT CITY OF RICHMOND, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER, DR. BILHARTZ M.D., DR. BROWN M.D., DR. DISTON M.D., DAVID NEWDORE, ESQ., DOES 1-100, Defendants. 12 13 Case No. 16-cv-02871-MMC JOHNATHAN WYCINSKY, Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT CITY OF RICHMOND, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, DOES 1-10, 17 Case No. 16-cv-02873-MMC Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court are the following two motions, each filed pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (1) plaintiff George Marcus’ (“Marcus”) motion, filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered September 26, 2016 in Case No. 16-2871; and (2) plaintiff Jonathan Wycinsky’s (“Wycinsky”) motion, filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered October 3, 2016 in Case No. 16-2873. On August 15, 2017, defendant City of Richmond (“the City”) filed, in each case, an opposition to both motions. Plaintiff did not file a reply. The matter came on regularly for hearing on September 15, 2017. Peter Bonis appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Marcus and Wycinsky. Christine Maloney of Foster Employment Law appeared on behalf of the City. Having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the arguments 1 made by counsel at the hearing, the Court, for the reasons stated on the record at the 2 hearing, hereby DENIES the motions. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: September 18, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?