Wycinsky v. City of Richmond et al
Filing
29
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 09/18/2017. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
GEORGE MARCUS,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT
CITY OF RICHMOND, CHRISTOPHER
MAGNUS, KAISER PERMANENTE
MEDICAL CENTER, DR. BILHARTZ M.D.,
DR. BROWN M.D., DR. DISTON M.D.,
DAVID NEWDORE, ESQ., DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
12
13
Case No. 16-cv-02871-MMC
JOHNATHAN WYCINSKY,
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT
CITY OF RICHMOND, CHRISTOPHER
MAGNUS, DOES 1-10,
17
Case No. 16-cv-02873-MMC
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Before the Court are the following two motions, each filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (1) plaintiff George Marcus’ (“Marcus”) motion,
filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered September 26, 2016 in Case No.
16-2871; and (2) plaintiff Jonathan Wycinsky’s (“Wycinsky”) motion, filed August 1, 2017,
for relief from judgment entered October 3, 2016 in Case No. 16-2873. On August 15,
2017, defendant City of Richmond (“the City”) filed, in each case, an opposition to both
motions. Plaintiff did not file a reply. The matter came on regularly for hearing on
September 15, 2017. Peter Bonis appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Marcus and Wycinsky.
Christine Maloney of Foster Employment Law appeared on behalf of the City.
Having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the arguments
1
made by counsel at the hearing, the Court, for the reasons stated on the record at the
2
hearing, hereby DENIES the motions.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: September 18, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?