Wycinsky v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 6/30/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 6/23/2016. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JONATHAN WYCINSKY,

Case No. 16-cv-02873-SK

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9
10

CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,

Regarding Docket No. 5

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On June 3, 2016, Defendant City of Richmond filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it for

13

a hearing on July 20, 2016. Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff

14

Jonathan Wycinsky’s response was due to be filed by June 17, 2016. To date, Plaintiff has not

15

filed an opposition brief. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to Show Cause (“OSC”)

16

in writing by no later than June 30, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this case for lack of

17

prosecution or, in the alternative, grant Defendant’s motion as unopposed. If Plaintiff seeks to file

18

an opposition brief to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff must demonstrate good cause for his failure to

19

comply with the deadline required by the Local Rules, and must submit his proposed opposition

20

brief with his response to the OSC. If Plaintiff fails to file a response to this OSC by June 30,

21

2016, Plaintiff is admonished that this case will be reassigned to a District Judge, and the Court

22

will recommend that this case be dismissed without prejudice without further notice to Plaintiff. If

23

Plaintiff seeks to file an opposition brief and demonstrates good cause, the Court will set a new

24

deadline for Defendant to file a reply brief and will, if necessary, continue the hearing.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 23, 2016
______________________________________
SALLIE KIM
United States Magistrate Judge