Godhigh et al-v-Savers, LLC

Filing 52

ORDER granting 49 Stipulation to Reset Deadlines as to 45 MOTION to Certify Class. Response due by 10/19/2016. Reply due by 11/2/2016. Motion Hearing set for 11/30/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick.Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/14/2016. Case Management Conference is also continued to 11/30/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fraser A. McAlpine (State Bar No. 248554) Douglas G.A. Johnston (State Bar No. 268880) JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 50 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4615 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Email: fraser.mcalpine@jacksonlewis.com Email: douglas.johnston@jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Defendants TVI, INC. d/b/a SAVERS and VALUE VILLAGE; and SAVERS, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 EARL GODHIGH, and ANGELA OSGOOD, individually and on behalf of all other members of the general public similarly situated and on behalf of other similarly aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 Case No. 3:16-cv-02874-WHO JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION AND PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION v. 17 18 TVI, INC. D/B/A SAVERS and VALUE VILLAGE; and SAVERS, LLC., 19 Defendants. Ctrm: Judge: 2, 17th Floor William H. Orrick, District Judge Complaint Filed: 05/27/2016 Trial Date: None Set 20 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants TVI, INC. D/B/A SAVERS and Value 22 Village and SAVERS, LLC and Plaintiffs Earl Godhigh and Angela Osgood and, by and through 23 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served their Notice of Motion and Motion for Conditional FLSA Collective Action Certification and Issuance of Notice on September 21, 2016; WHEREAS, Defendants currently have until October 5, 2016 to answer or respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification; WHEREAS, Defendants have requested and Plaintiffs have consented to an additional 14 1 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TIME RE: OPPO. AND REPLY TO MOTION FOR COND. CERT. Case No. 3:16-cv-02874-WHO 1 2 days for Defendants’ to file their opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification; WHEREAS, Defendants agree to toll the Fair Labor Standards Act claims, and only those 3 claims, for the prospective members of the collective action for an additional 14 days from 4 October 5 to 19, 2016; 5 WHEREAS, the parties agree that Plaintiffs’ reply for the Motion for Conditional 6 Certification shall be due 14 days following Defendants’ filing of their opposition to Plaintiffs’ 7 Motion for Conditional Certification; 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, an additional 14 days for Defendants’ opposition and an additional 14 days for Plaintiffs’ reply to the Motion for Conditional Certification will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, 12 through their respective counsel, that: (1) Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiffs’ 13 Motion for Conditional Certification no later than October 19, 2016; (2) Plaintiffs shall file their 14 reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification no later than November 2, 2016; (3) the 15 Fair Labor Standards Act claims, and only those claims, for the prospective members of the 16 collective action for an additional 14 days to October 19, 2016; and (4) the hearing on Plaintiffs’ 17 Motion be set for November 16, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. 18 Dated: October 5, 2016 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 19 20 By: 21 22 23 24 Dated: October 5, 2016 /s/ Douglas G.A. Johnston Fraser A. McAlpine Douglas G.A. Johnston Attorneys for Defendant TVI, INC. d/b/a SAVERS and VALUE VILLAGE; and SAVERS, LLC OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP 25 26 By: 27 /s/ Jahan C. Sagafi Jahan C. Sagafi Attorneys for Plaintiffs 28 2 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TIME RE: OPPO. AND REPLY TO MOTION FOR COND. CERT. Case No. 3:16-cv-02874-WHO 1 2 CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM ALL SIGNATORIES I, Douglas G.A. Johnston, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used 3 to file this Joint Stipulation Regarding the Extension of Time to Oppose and Reply to Plaintiff’s 4 Motion for Conditional Certification. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby 5 attest that I have obtained the concurrence of each signatory to this document and have obtained 6 authorization to use their electronic signature to sign this document. 7 8 Dated: October 5, 2016 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 9 10 By: 11 /s/ Douglas G.A. Johnston Douglas G.A. Johnston 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TIME RE: OPPO. AND REPLY TO MOTION FOR COND. CERT. Case No. 3:16-cv-02874-WHO 1 Having considered the above stipulation by the parties, the Court Orders as follows: 2 1) Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification no 3 later than October 19, 2016; (2) Plaintiffs shall file their reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 4 Conditional Certification no later than November 2, 2016; (3) the Fair Labor Standards Act 5 claims, and only those claims, for the prospective members of the collective action for an 6 additional 14 days to October 19, 2016; and (4) the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion be set for 7 November 16, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. November 30, 2016 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED 10 11 14 Date: October ____, 2016 THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TIME RE: OPPO. AND REPLY TO MOTION FOR COND. CERT. Case No. 3:16-cv-02874-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?