Blackburn v. Oracle America, Inc.

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR STIPULATED RULE 502(d) ORDER filed by Oracle America, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Daniel Velton (SBN 267890)
VJ Chetty (SBN 271778)
VELTON ZEGELMAN P.C.
525 W. Remington Drive, Suite 106
Sunnyvale, CA 94087
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Michael Delikat (NY State Bar No. MD1165)
Appearing pro hac vice
[e-mail]
Renee B. Phillips (NY State Bar No. RP4456)
Appearing pro hac vice
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
51 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019-6142
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Kenneth Herzinger (SBN 209688)
[e-mail]
Erin M. Connell (SBN 223355)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendant

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20

Case No. 3:16-cv-02925-EMC
SVETLANA BLACKBURN,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Hon. Edward M. Chen
Action Filed: June 1, 2016

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OHSUSA:766045191.1

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED RULE
502(d) ORDER

1

I. PURPOSE

2

This Stipulated Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”)

3

in this case as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s Guidelines for

4

the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information, and any other applicable orders and rules.

5
6
7
8
9
10

II. DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY
(1)

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents,

electronically stored information (“ESI”) or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is
not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or
state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed
by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
(2)

Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to

11
conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance,
12
responsiveness and/or segregation of privilege and/or protected information before productions.
13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15
16
17

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: November 28, 2016

VELTON ZEGELMAN P.C.

18
By:
19
20

/s/ Daniel Velton
DANIEL VELTON
Attorneys for Plaintiff

21
22

Dated: November 28, 2016

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
By:

23
24

/s/ Michael Delikat
MICHAEL DELIKAT
Attorneys for Defendant
.

25
26
27

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.

28
OHSUSA:766045191.1

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 502(D) ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02925-EMC

1

Dated: November 28, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

2

/s/ Michael Delikat
MICHAEL DELIKAT

3
4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

RT

11

J

ER

H

12

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

NO

10

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

LI

UNIT
ED

Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

8

13

FO

11/29/2016

S

Dated:

RT
U
O

7

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

6

A

5

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OHSUSA:766045191.1

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 502(D) ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02925-EMC