Doe 1 et al v. Xytex Corporation et al

Filing 101

REMINDER NOTICE OF UPCOMING TRIAL (11/6/2017) AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (11/1/2017). Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/23/2017. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JANE DOE 1 & JANE DOE 2, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiffs, No. C 16-2935 WHA v. XYTEX CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation, XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL LTD., a Georgia corporation, MARY HARTLEY, an individual, J. TODD SPRADLIN, an individual, and DOES 1–25, inclusive, Defendants. / 17 18 19 REMINDER NOTICE OF UPCOMING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE This notice serves as a friendly reminder that this case remains set for a FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on NOVEMBER 1, 2017, at 2:00 P.M., with a JURY TRIAL on 20 NOVEMBER 6, 2017. Please consult the existing case management order and review and follow 21 all standing guidelines and orders of the undersigned for civil cases on the Court’s website at 22 Continuances will rarely be granted. 23 The final pretrial conference will be an important event, for it will be there that the 24 shape of the upcoming trial will be determined, including in limine orders, time limits and 25 exhibit mechanics. Lead trial counsel must attend. 26 To avoid any misunderstanding with respect to the final pretrial conference and trial, the 27 Court wishes to emphasize that all filings and appearances must be made — on pain of 28 dismissal, default or other sanction — unless and until a dismissal fully resolving the case is received. It will not be enough to inform the clerk that a settlement in principle has been 1 reached or to lodge a partially executed settlement agreement or to lodge a fully executed 2 agreement (or dismissal) that resolves less than the entire case. Where, however, a 3 fully-executed and unconditional settlement agreement clearly and fully disposing of the entire 4 case is lodged reasonably in advance of the pretrial conference or trial and only a ministerial act 5 remains, the Court will arrange a status conference to work out an alternate procedure pending a 6 formal dismissal. 7 8 9 Please state whether the Court can be of further ADR assistance (but avoid stating offers, counteroffers or dollar amounts). The Court strongly encourages attorneys with fewer than four years of experience to take witnesses and to be an important part of the trial so as to train the next generation of trial 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 lawyers. 12 13 14 Dated: October 23, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?