Doe 1 et al v. Xytex Corporation et al

Filing 25

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D., AND MARY HARTLEY by Hon. William Alsup granting 24 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

JOHN L. SUPPLE (SBN: 94582)
[e-mail]
ROBERT D. SANFORD (SBN: 129790)
[e-mail]
KATHLEEN HUMPHREY (SBN 169374)
[e-mail]
J SUPPLE LAW
A Professional Corporation
2330 Marinship Way, Suite 250
Sausalito, CA 94965
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
XYTEX CORPORATION, XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN,
M.D., MARY HARTLEY

J SUPPLE LAW PC
2330 Marinship Way, Suite 250
Sausalito, CA 94965

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

JANE DOE 1 & JANE DOE 2,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,
vs.
XYTEX CORPORATION, a Georgia
Corporation; XYTEX CRYO
INTERNATIONAL LTD., a Georgia
Corporation; MARY HARTLEY, an
individual; J. TODD SPRADLIN, an
individual; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Case No. 3:16-cv-02935 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,
J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D., AND MARY
HARTLEY

Complaint Filed: April 18, 2016

Defendants.

22
23

Having considered the parties’ stipulation and for good cause,

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

25

That Defendants XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN,

26

M.D., and MARY HARTLEY are dismissed without prejudice subject to the statute of

27

limitations being tolled one year from the date of filing the dismissal or until the subject suit

28

against Xytex Corporation resolves by settlement, dismissal, judgment, or transfer of venue.
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
XYTEX CRYO INT’L, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D. AND MARY HARTLEY

Case No. 3:16-cv-02935 WHA

1

Plaintiffs will not file suit against XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD

2

SPRADLIN, M.D., and MARY HARTLEY in any other jurisdiction other than the Northern

3

District of California during the pendency of this action and shall not file in any jurisdiction after

4

the subject suit is dismissed.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 14
_____________________, 2016

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9

J SUPPLE LAW PC
2330 Marinship Way, Suite 250
Sausalito, CA 94965

10
11
12

F:\Doe v Xytex\Pleadings\Doe v Xytex - Prop Order Stipulation for Dismissal.docx

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
XYTEX CRYO INT’L, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D. AND MARY HARTLEY

Case No. 3:16-cv-02935 WHA