Doe 1 et al v. Xytex Corporation et al
Filing
25
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D., AND MARY HARTLEY by Hon. William Alsup granting 24 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JOHN L. SUPPLE (SBN: 94582)
jsupple@jsupplelaw.com
ROBERT D. SANFORD (SBN: 129790)
rsanford@jsupplelaw.com
KATHLEEN HUMPHREY (SBN 169374)
khumphrey@jsupplelaw.com
J SUPPLE LAW
A Professional Corporation
2330 Marinship Way, Suite 250
Sausalito, CA 94965
Telephone: (415) 366-5533
Facsimile: (415) 480-6301
Attorneys for Defendants
XYTEX CORPORATION, XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN,
M.D., MARY HARTLEY
J SUPPLE LAW PC
2330 Marinship Way, Suite 250
Sausalito, CA 94965
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
JANE DOE 1 & JANE DOE 2,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs,
vs.
XYTEX CORPORATION, a Georgia
Corporation; XYTEX CRYO
INTERNATIONAL LTD., a Georgia
Corporation; MARY HARTLEY, an
individual; J. TODD SPRADLIN, an
individual; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02935 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,
J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D., AND MARY
HARTLEY
Complaint Filed: April 18, 2016
Defendants.
22
23
Having considered the parties’ stipulation and for good cause,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
25
That Defendants XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN,
26
M.D., and MARY HARTLEY are dismissed without prejudice subject to the statute of
27
limitations being tolled one year from the date of filing the dismissal or until the subject suit
28
against Xytex Corporation resolves by settlement, dismissal, judgment, or transfer of venue.
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
XYTEX CRYO INT’L, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D. AND MARY HARTLEY
Case No. 3:16-cv-02935 WHA
1
Plaintiffs will not file suit against XYTEX CRYO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., J. TODD
2
SPRADLIN, M.D., and MARY HARTLEY in any other jurisdiction other than the Northern
3
District of California during the pendency of this action and shall not file in any jurisdiction after
4
the subject suit is dismissed.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 14
_____________________, 2016
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
J SUPPLE LAW PC
2330 Marinship Way, Suite 250
Sausalito, CA 94965
10
11
12
F:\Doe v Xytex\Pleadings\Doe v Xytex - Prop Order Stipulation for Dismissal.docx
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
XYTEX CRYO INT’L, LTD., J. TODD SPRADLIN, M.D. AND MARY HARTLEY
Case No. 3:16-cv-02935 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?