Doe 1 et al v. Xytex Corporation et al
Filing
99
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT by Judge Alsup denying 92 Motion ; denying 93 Motion. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 16-02935 WHA
JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2,
Plaintiffs,
v.
12
XYTEX CORPORATION, and XYTEX
CRYO INTERNATIONAL LTD.,
13
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR APPOINTMENT OF
GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND TO
APPROVE SETTLEMENT
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Jane Doe One, seeks appointment as guardian ad litem of her eleven-year-old
16
biological child, Baby Doe, a non-party, and approval of a settlement on Baby Doe’s behalf. As
17
stated on the record, this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Baby Doe (who is not a
18
party), and therefore cannot approve a settlement on her behalf. On this basis, the motion is
19
DENIED.
20
This order further notes, however, that the settlement proposed here — which forecloses
21
to the minor any future legal remedies against Xytex in exchange for a small lump sum payment
22
— is troubling (see Dkt. No. 97-3). In support of this compromise, plaintiffs have submitted a
23
declaration from a psychologist stating that offspring of one schizophrenic parent has only a ten
24
percent chance of developing schizophrenia (Dkt. No. 97-8 ¶ 3). They have further declared
25
that Baby Doe yet shows no signs of schizophrenia, and therefore a $50,000 settlement (of
26
which Baby Doe will only receive $30,000 after deduction of attorney’s fees) is fair and
27
reasonable (Dkt. No. 97-3 at 8). These declarations do not supply any information about what
28
age the symptoms of schizophrenia typically begin to manifest, or what lifelong costs of
treatment would run. Instead, plaintiffs reason that because they cannot currently show that it is
1
more probable than not Baby Doe will develop an injury, the relatively low settlement amount
2
is fair (ibid.).
3
Should Baby Doe develop schizophrenia, or any other undisclosed medical condition for
4
that matter, she should be permitted to seek compensation at that time. Compromising her
5
future potential rights for a relatively insignificant sum could result in serious harm. Were this
6
proposed compromise properly before this Court, it would be inclined to deny approval.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: October 18, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?