Petrolino, et al v. City and County San Francisco, et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 69 FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/2/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)

Download PDF
1 JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 2 BENJAMIN BIEN-KAHN – 267933 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 3 50 Fremont Street, 19th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2235 4 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 jbornstein@rbgg.com 5 Email: egalvan@rbgg.com bbien-kahn@rbgg.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 FABIO PETROLINO; M.P., a minor, 12 through her guardian ad litem, Ana Petrolino; ANDRELINA SILVA; 13 ANGELA PETROLINO; and ALEX PETROLINO, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 17 FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; EVE ZEFF, ROEL LAPITAN and 18 RAPHROGER GONZAGA, Registered Nurses, San Francisco Department of 19 Public Health; MICHAEL MOHN and RUDY ZAMORA, Sheriff’s Deputies, San 20 Francisco Sheriff’s Department; HEALTHRIGHT360, a California not-for21 profit corporation; LAUREN ERICKSON, Mental Health Provider, HealthRight360; 22 MARY LEFEVRE, Marriage and Family Therapist, HealthRight360; NICK 23 CRISPINO, Associate Social Worker, HealthRight360; DANIEL MITCHELL, 24 Officer, California Highway Patrol; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26 Case No. 16-cv-2946-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Trial Date: February 26, 2018 27 28 [3089025-2] 16-cv-2946-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have discovered the true identities of Defendants DOE 3 and 3 DOE 4 through review of documents produced by Defendant City and County of San 4 Francisco in mid-December 2016, and seek to amend the Second Amended Complaint to 5 substitute Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin O’Shea into the action in place of DOE 3 and Sheriff’s 6 Deputy Andrew Martinez into the action in place of DOE 4; 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss all claims brought against 8 Defendants Roel Lapitan, Mary Lefevre, and Raphroger Gonzaga with prejudice, with all 9 parties to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs with regard to claims against Roel 10 Lapitan, Mary Lefevre, and Raphroger Gonzaga; 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ filing of an amended complaint will not delay compliance 12 with any of the case management deadlines set by the Court; 13 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties 14 hereto through their respective counsel of record that Plaintiffs may, pursuant to Rule 15 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, file an amended complaint in the form of 16 the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 Respectfully submitted, 19 DATED: January 30, 2017 20 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 21 By: /s/ Benjamin Bien-Kahn Benjamin Bien-Kahn Attorney for Plaintiffs 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [3089025-2] 16-cv-2946-RS 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 DATED: January 30, 2017 2 3 4 By: /s/ Mark D. Lipton Mark D. Lipton Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants City and County of San Francisco, Eve Zeff, Roel Lapitan, Raphroger Gonzaga, Michael Mohn, Rudy Zamora, Kevin O’Shea, and Andrew Martinez 5 6 7 8 9 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS Chief Trial Deputy DATED: January 30, 2017 GORDON & REES LLP 10 By: /s/ Kathleen M. Rhoads Kathleen M. Rhoads Attorneys for Defendants HealthRight 360, a California nonprofit, Lauren Erickson, Mary Lefevre, and Nick Crispino 11 12 13 14 15 DATED: January 30, 2017 16 17 By: /s/ Micah C.E. Osgood Micah C.E. Osgood Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Daniel Mitchell 18 19 20 ECF Attestation 21 22 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JOHN P. DEVINE Supervising Deputy Attorney General I, Benjamin Bien-Kahn, attest that concurrence in the e-filing of this document has 23 been received from the above signatories, in compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). 24 DATED: January 30, 2017 25 By: /s/ Benjamin Bien-Kahn Benjamin Bien-Kahn 26 27 28 [3089025-2] 16-cv-2946-RS 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Based on the written stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, Plaintiff 3 may file an amended complaint in the form the Third Amended Complaint, attached hereto 4 as Exhibit A. 5 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 2/2 7 DATED: _______________, 2017 8 9 10 The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [3089025-2] 16-cv-2946-RS 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?