Hernandez et al v. MP California et al

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by MP California, MP Nexlevel of California, Inc., MP Nexlevel, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/5/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 John L. Fitzgerald, Esq. (SBN 126613) jfitzgerald@fmglaw.com Kacie L. Manisco (SBN 294242) kmanisco@fmglaw.com FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY LLP 101 California St., 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.394.9500 Facsimile: 415.394.9501 Attorneys for Defendant MP NEXLEVEL, LLC and MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE HERNANDEZ, as an individual, GIOVANNI HERNANDEZ, as an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-03015-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R.6-1(a).] Plaintiffs, 13 Complaint Filed: June 3, 2016 v. 14 15 16 17 18 MP CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation; MP NEXLEVEL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company; MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Minnesota Corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-03015-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(a).] 1 Pursuant to the United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rules, 2 Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Jose Hernandez and Giovanni Hernandez (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants MP 3 NEXLEVEL, LLC and MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (“Defendants”), by and through 4 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 5 Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 6-1(a), the respective attorneys for Plaintiffs and 6 Defendants agree that Defendants will have until and including Friday, August 19, 2016 to respond 7 or otherwise plead to the First Amended Complaint, unless a subsequent order of the Court extends 8 or has the effect of further extending the time for Defendants to respond or otherwise plead to the 9 Complaint. Current Court ordered event dates or deadlines are not affected by this stipulation. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: August 3, 2016 FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY, LLP 13 By: /s/ Kacie Manisco Kacie L. Manisco Attorney for Defendants MP NEXLEVEL, LLC and MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 14 15 16 17 Dated: August 3, 2016 SHIMODA LAW CORP. 18 By: /s/ Justin Rodriguez Justin Rodriguez Attorney for Plaintiffs Jose Hernandez and Giovanni Hernandez 19 20 S Spero A H ER LI RT 24 FO seph C. Judge Jo R NIA ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 23 Dated: 8/5/16 UNIT ED 22 RT U O 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-03015-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(a).] 1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 2 3 I hereby attest that all signatories listed above, on whose behalf this stipulation is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 4 Dated: July 29, 2016 FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY, LLP 5 6 7 8 By: /s/_Kacie Manisco______________________ Attorney for Defendants MP NEXLEVEL, LLC and MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-03015-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(a).]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?