Yanushkevich v. Aaron Brothers, Inc. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #17 Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Aaron Brothers, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/7/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LEON COSGROVE, LLC John Bosco, Texas State Bar Number 24045533 8117 Preston Road, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75225 Telephone: (214) 578-3529 Fax: (305) 437-8158 Email: jbosco@leoncosgrove.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorney for AARON BROTHERS, INC., Defendant 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 DMITRY YANUSHKEVICH, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 AARON BROTHERS, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a AARON BROTHERS ART & FRAMING; ALEX DELLY, an individual; SHARON K. DELLY, an individual; ROBERT G. BLATMAN, an individual; and DOES 1-20 inclusive, Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16-cv-3019-EMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 20 21 22 WHEREAS, in the interest of conserving party and judicial resources and exploring the possibility of an early resolution, Plaintiff Dmitry Yanushkevich (“Plaintiff”), has provided Defendant Aaron Brothers, Inc., Defendant Alex Delly, Defendant Sharon K. Delly, and 23 Defendant Robert G. Blatman (collectively, “Defendants”) with a settlement demand, 24 Defendants have responded and the parties are actively engaged in productive settlement 25 discussions; 26 27 WHEREAS, a resolution of the case would obviate Defendants’ need to respond to the Complaint; 28 {00112092. 1 } Page 1 of 3 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No.: 16-CV-3019-EMC 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to extend Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Complaint; Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the following deadlines apply: November 11, 2016 5 6 Last Day for Defendants to Respond to Complaint November 11, 2016 Last Day for Plaintiff to file “Notice of Need for Mediation” 7 No provision of this Stipulation shall be construed as a waiver of any and all claims or 8 defenses available to either Plaintiff or Defendants, and any and all such claims and defenses are 9 hereby expressly reserved. 10 11 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 26, 2016 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili Irene Karbelashvili, Attorney for Plaintiff Dmitry Yanushkevich Dated: October 26, 2016 /s/ John Bosco John Bosco, Attorney for Defendant Aaron Brothers, Inc. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that I, John D. Bosco, received the concurrence of counsel for Plaintiff in the filing of this document. 21 22 By: /s/ John Bosco JOHN BOSCO 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00112092. 1 } Page 2 of 3 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No.: 16-CV-3019-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following deadlines apply: 4 November 11, 2016 Last Day for Defendants to Respond to Complaint 5 November 11, 2016 Last Day for Plaintiff to file “Notice of Need for Mediation” UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 7 ER H 13 dwar Judge E 14 N F D IS T IC T O R 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00112092. 1 } FO RT 12 en d M. Ch NO 11 LI 10 R NIA __________________________________________ D RDERE THE HONORABLE JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN IS SO O DISTRICT JUDGE IT UNITED STATES 9 A 6 Page 3 of 3 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No.: 16-CV-3019-EMC C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?