The American Insurance Company v. R&Q Reinsurance Company
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 42 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re 39 MOTION to Dismiss The American Insurance Company's Amended Complaint and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities Stipulation to Continue the Briefing Schedule filed by The American Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 30, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
DENTONS US LLP
KELLY D. FAIR (Bar No. 245408)
kelly.fair@dentons.com
SHAWN L. KELLY (Pro Hac Vice)
shawn.kelly@dentons.com
JOHN R. VALES (Pro Hac Vice)
john.vales@dentons.com
One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 267-4000; Facsimile: (415) 267-4198
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff The American Insurance Company
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA , SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105
(415) 267-4000
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
The American Insurance Company,
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 3:16-cv-3044-JST
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON R&Q
REINSURANCE COMPANY’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED
COMPLAINT
v.
15
R&Q Reinsurance Company,
16
Defendant.
Date: December 22, 2016
17
Time: 2pm
18
Courtroom: 9, 19th Floor
19
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
20
21
22
Pursuant to Local Rules 7-12 and 6-2, Plaintiff The American Insurance Company
23
(“TAIC”) and Defendant R&Q Reinsurance Company’s (“R&Q Re”) (collectively, the “Parties”)
24
hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue the briefing schedule
25
related to R&Q Re’s Motion to Dismiss TAIC’s Amended Complaint as follows:
26
RECITALS
27
28
1.
On October 12, 2016, the Court granted Defendant R&Q Re’s Motion to Dismiss
3:16-cv-3044-JST
-1-
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON
R&Q RE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
TAIC’s Complaint, with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 35.)
2.
On November 2, 2016, TAIC timely filed its Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 38.)
3.
On November 15, 2016, R&Q Re timely filed a Motion to Dismiss TAIC’s
3
4
5
Amended Complaint which is scheduled to be heard on December 22, 2016. (Dkt. No. 39.)
6
TAIC’s deadline to oppose R&Q Re’s motion is November 29, 2016.
7
4.
On November 18, 2016, the Parties’ counsel conducted a telephone conference
with the Court’s appointed ADR officer, Sarah Winslow. On that call the Parties could not reach
9
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA , SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105
(415) 267-4000
8
a consensus on terms to continue R&Q Re’s motion to dismiss or to enlarge TAIC’s time to file
10
its opposition brief.
11
5.
On November 22, 2016, TAIC filed an administrative motion to continue R&Q
12
Re’s Motion to Dismiss and enlarge TAIC’s time to oppose R&Q Re’s motion by two-weeks to
13
account for the Thanksgiving Holiday and the unavailability of TAIC’s counsel and principals.
14
(Dkt. Nos. 40, 40-1, and 40-2.)
15
16
6.
On November 28, 2016, R&Q Re filed a response to TAIC’s administrative
17
motion agreeing to continue the briefing schedule related to R&Q Re’s motion. In its response,
18
R&Q Re proposed to the Court that its motion to dismiss is suitable for disposition without oral
19
argument. (Dkt. Nos. 41, 41-1, and 41-2.)
20
21
7.
The Parties disagree whether the Court should hear oral argument on R&Q Re’s
motion to dismiss and acknowledge that this decision is within the Court’s discretion.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
Principals for R&Q Re and TAIC have recently engaged in settlement discussions,
including an exchange of written settlement communications. A Settlement Conference is
scheduled for January 3, 2017 before the Honorable U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez.
9.
The only other enlargement of time requested in this case was the Parties’
stipulation to extend R&Q Re’s time to file a reply brief in support of its first Motion to Dismiss.
3:16-cv-3044-JST
-2-
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON
R&Q RE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
(Dkt. No. 24.)
10.
Granting this stipulation should have no impact on the schedule of this case other
than to suspend or delay motion practice while the Parties continue settlement negotiations.
4
5
11.
Pursuant to the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following
6
continuation of the briefing schedule related to R&Q Re’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 39), and
7
request the Court’s approval of their stipulation to the proposed briefing schedule as follows:
8
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA , SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105
(415) 267-4000
9
Event
Previous
Date
Stipulated/Requested
New Date
Last Day to Oppose R&Q Re’s Motion to
Dismiss
11/29/16
12/20/16
13
Last Day to File Reply Brief in support of
Motion to Dismiss
12/6/16
1/10/17
14
Hearing on R&Q Re’s Motion to Dismiss
12/22/16
10
11
12
2/2/17
15
16
17
DENTONS US LLP
Dated: November 29, 2016
18
By /s/ Kelly D. Fair
Kelly D. Fair
19
20
Attorneys for Plaintiff The American Insurance
Company
21
22
23
Dated: November 29, 2016
SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER &
MAHNEY, LTD
24
By /s/ Timothy C. Connor
Timothy C. Connor
25
26
Attorneys for R&Q Reinsurance Company
27
28
3:16-cv-3044-JST
-3-
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON
R&Q RE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that he has obtained
concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the indicated signatories to the document.
5
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: November 30 2016
__________,
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA , SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105
(415) 267-4000
9
10
11
12
101977504\V-1
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:16-cv-3044-JST
-4-
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON
R&Q RE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?