Dunson et al v. Cordis Corporation

Filing 28

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/27/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HEATHER QUINN, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 16-cv-03080-WHO REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP v. CORDIS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendant. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), this case and following cases are hereby REFERRED 13 to the Honorable Susan Illston for consideration whether the cases are related to Dunson, et al. v. 14 Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03076-SI: 15 Resovsky v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03082-EMC 16 Grant, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03083-HSG 17 Herbert, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03085-JST 18 Holden, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03087-TEH 19 Oehring, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 4:16-cv-03088-JSW 20 Barber, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03086-JD 21 Sutton, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-04012-VC 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 27, 2016 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?