Dunson et al v. Cordis Corporation
Filing
28
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/27/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HEATHER QUINN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 16-cv-03080-WHO
REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF
DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP
v.
CORDIS CORPORATION,
Re: Dkt. No. 29
Defendant.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), this case and following cases are hereby REFERRED
13
to the Honorable Susan Illston for consideration whether the cases are related to Dunson, et al. v.
14
Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03076-SI:
15
Resovsky v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03082-EMC
16
Grant, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03083-HSG
17
Herbert, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03085-JST
18
Holden, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03087-TEH
19
Oehring, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 4:16-cv-03088-JSW
20
Barber, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-03086-JD
21
Sutton, et al. v. Cordis Corp., et al., 3:16-cv-04012-VC
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 27, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?