Dunson et al v. Cordis Corporation

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting Hearing re: CAFA Jurisdiction from 9/1/2016 to 9/8/2016 01:15 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/18/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CROWELL & MORING LLP Kevin C. Mayer (CSB No. 118177) E-mail: kmayer@crowell.com 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.986.2800 Facsimile: 415.986.2827 Andrew D. Kaplan (Appearance pro hac vice) E-mail: akaplan@crowell.com Rebecca B. Chaney (Appearance pro hac vice) E-mail: rchaney@crowell.com 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202.624.2500 Facsimile: 202.628.5116 9 Attorneys for Defendant Cordis Corporation 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 JERRY DUNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, 16 17 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE 20 Re: Case Nos. 16-cv-03080-EMC, 16-cv-03082-EMC, 16-cv-03083-EMC, 16-cv-03085-EMC, 16-cv-03086-EMC, 16-cv-03087-EMC, 16-cv-03088-EMC, 16-cv-04012-EMC, 16-cv-04409-EMC 21 Civil L.R. 6-1(b) 18 19 CORDIS CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE; CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC 1 All parties in the above-identified cases have signed a joint stipulation requesting that this 2 Court reschedule the hearing on the question of federal jurisdiction currently set for September 1, 3 2016. Case No. 16-cv-03076, Dkt. No. 37 (Aug. 9, 2016). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), 4 the Court orders that the hearing on federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act is 5 rescheduled to September 8, 2016, at 1:15 P.M. 8 8/18/16 Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Court Judge n M. Che Edward Judge RT 11 FO NO 10 H ER LI Dated: 12 13 A 9 D RDERE OO IT IS S R NIA UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 7 S 6 N D IS T IC T R OF C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE; CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 I, Jennifer Tai, certify that on August 18, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with 4 the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, by using the 5 CM/ECF system. 6 I further certify that on August 18, 2016, I placed the foregoing document in an envelope 7 for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practice, by First-Class Mail, postage 8 prepaid, to the following non-CM/ECF participants involved in the described cases: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW Counsel Case Numbers/Case Names Turner W. Branch Margaret M. Branch Adam T. Funk BRANCH LAW FIRM 2025 Rio Grande Boulevard, NW Albuquerque, NM 87104 Telephone: (505) 243-3500 Facsimile: (505) 243-3534 Barber, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-3086-EMC Gregory David Rueb RUEB & MOTTA, PLC 1401 Willow Pass Rd., Suite 880 Concord, CA 94520 Phone: 925.602.3400 Fax: 925.602.0622 Herbert, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-3085-EMC Howard Nations THE NATIONS LAW FIRM 3131 Briarpark Dr., Suite 208 Houston, TX 77042 Phone: 713.807.8400 Fax: 713.807.8423 David P. Matthews MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES 2905 Sackett Street Houston, TX 77098 Telephone: (713) 522-5250 Facsimile: (713) 535-7136 Oehring, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-3088-EMC Richard A. Freese Tim K. Goss FREESE & GOSS, PLLC 3500 Maple Avenue, Suite 1100 Dallas, TX 75219 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE; CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?