Dunson et al v. Cordis Corporation
Filing
42
STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting Hearing re: CAFA Jurisdiction from 9/1/2016 to 9/8/2016 01:15 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/18/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CROWELL & MORING LLP
Kevin C. Mayer (CSB No. 118177)
E-mail: kmayer@crowell.com
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415.986.2800
Facsimile:
415.986.2827
Andrew D. Kaplan (Appearance pro hac vice)
E-mail: akaplan@crowell.com
Rebecca B. Chaney (Appearance pro hac vice)
E-mail: rchaney@crowell.com
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone:
202.624.2500
Facsimile:
202.628.5116
9
Attorneys for Defendant Cordis Corporation
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
JERRY DUNSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION TO
RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE
20
Re: Case Nos. 16-cv-03080-EMC,
16-cv-03082-EMC, 16-cv-03083-EMC,
16-cv-03085-EMC, 16-cv-03086-EMC,
16-cv-03087-EMC, 16-cv-03088-EMC,
16-cv-04012-EMC, 16-cv-04409-EMC
21
Civil L.R. 6-1(b)
18
19
CORDIS CORPORATION, et al.,
Case No. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION
TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE;
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC
1
All parties in the above-identified cases have signed a joint stipulation requesting that this
2
Court reschedule the hearing on the question of federal jurisdiction currently set for September 1,
3
2016. Case No. 16-cv-03076, Dkt. No. 37 (Aug. 9, 2016). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b),
4
the Court orders that the hearing on federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act is
5
rescheduled to September 8, 2016, at 1:15 P.M.
8
8/18/16
Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Court Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
RT
11
FO
NO
10
H
ER
LI
Dated:
12
13
A
9
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
UNIT
ED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
7
S
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION
TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE;
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
I, Jennifer Tai, certify that on August 18, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with
4
the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, by using the
5
CM/ECF system.
6
I further certify that on August 18, 2016, I placed the foregoing document in an envelope
7
for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practice, by First-Class Mail, postage
8
prepaid, to the following non-CM/ECF participants involved in the described cases:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
Counsel
Case Numbers/Case Names
Turner W. Branch
Margaret M. Branch
Adam T. Funk
BRANCH LAW FIRM
2025 Rio Grande Boulevard, NW
Albuquerque, NM 87104
Telephone: (505) 243-3500
Facsimile: (505) 243-3534
Barber, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-3086-EMC
Gregory David Rueb
RUEB & MOTTA, PLC
1401 Willow Pass Rd., Suite 880
Concord, CA 94520
Phone: 925.602.3400
Fax: 925.602.0622
Herbert, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-3085-EMC
Howard Nations
THE NATIONS LAW FIRM
3131 Briarpark Dr., Suite 208
Houston, TX 77042
Phone: 713.807.8400
Fax: 713.807.8423
David P. Matthews
MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES
2905 Sackett Street
Houston, TX 77098
Telephone: (713) 522-5250
Facsimile: (713) 535-7136
Oehring, et al v. Cordis Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-3088-EMC
Richard A. Freese
Tim K. Goss
FREESE & GOSS, PLLC
3500 Maple Avenue, Suite 1100
Dallas, TX 75219
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION
TO RESCHEDULE HEARING DATE;
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03076-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?