Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria v. Ceiba Legal, LLP et al

Filing 59

ORDER DENYING 58 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 11 ELEM INDIAN COLONY OF POMO INDIANS OF THE SULPHUR BANK RANCHERIA, a federally recognized Indian tribe, 12 Plaintiff, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 13 14 15 No. C 16-03081 WHA ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. CEIBA LEGAL, LLP, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 On October 13, the parties filed a stipulated request for an order mandating a 18 “Settlement Conference for members of the groups acting as the Garcia Faction and Brown 19 Faction Executive Committees” before Judge Vadas. The parties also requested that the order 20 require “a list of core issues” to be submitted to the Court. The conference and list of issues are 21 measures to facilitate settlement that the parties, in consultation with Judge Vadas, had 22 previously agreed upon (Dkt. No. 58 at 2). 23 Although the Court is sympathetic to the idea of getting both factions together in a 24 settlement conference, the Court can only order actual parties properly before it to join in these 25 proceedings. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulated request is DENIED. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: October 18, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?