Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria v. Ceiba Legal, LLP et al
Filing
66
ORDER APPROVING 65 STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
PAULA M. YOST (State Bar No. 156843)
paula.yost@dentons.com
IAN R. BARKER (State Bar No. 240223)
ian.barker@denton.com
DENTONS US LLP
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, 24th Floor
Telephone: (415) 882-5000
Facsimile: (415) 882-0300
Attorneys for Defendant
CEIBA LEGAL, LLP
7
8
[Counsel for Other Parties Listed on
Signature Page]
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA
SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
ELEM INDIAN COLONY OF POMO
INDIANS OF THE SULPHUR BANK
RANCHERIA, A FEDERALLY
RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE
16
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
19
20
21
CEIBA LEGAL, LLP, MICHAEL
HUNTER, ANTHONY STEELE,
DAVID BROWN, ADRIAN JOHN,
PAUL STEWARD, NATALIE
SEDANO GARCIA, KIUYA BROWN,
AND DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE,
22
Case No.: 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL
OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND
HEARING
[L.R. 6-2]
Defendants.
23
24
STIPULATION
25
Plaintiff and defendants Ceiba Legal, LLP, Michael Hunter, Anthony Steele, David
26
Brown, Adrian John, Natalie Sedano Garcia, and Kiuya Brown (collectively the “Undersigned
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND HEARING (L.R. 6-1)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
101897427\V-6
1
Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows, and respectfully request that the Court approve
2
and give effect to their stipulation:
3
1.
This Court granted the Motions to Dismiss of Ceiba Legal, LLP, and Michael
4
Hunter, Anthony Steele, David Brown, Adrian John, Natalie Sedano Garcia, and Kiuya Brown
5
(“Undersigned Defendants”) on November 3, 2016. (ECF No. 63.)
6
2.
Based on this Court’s judgment, the Undersigned Defendants plan to file a motion
7
for an order requiring Plaintiff pay attorney’s fees of the Undersigned Defendants incurred in
8
defending this action, which motion is currently due November 17, 2016.
9
3.
Plaintiff desires that Gregory Fayard of Klinedinst PC handle all further
proceedings in this case on Plaintiff’s behalf, including defending any attorneys’ fees motions.
11
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA
SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
10
Mr. Fayard has represented that he expects today to receive formal documents substituting him
12
in as counsel for Plaintiff in place of Jack Duran of Duran Law Office.
13
4.
Counsel for the Undersigned Defendants have contacted Mr. Fayard to meet and
14
confer for the purpose of attempting to resolve any disputes with respect to attorneys’ fees and
15
evaluate whether the Undersigned Parties can reach a negotiated solution without the need for a
16
motion before this Court, as required by Local Rule 54-5(b)(1).
17
5.
Mr. Fayard has represented that given his recent retention as counsel, additional
18
time is required to develop an understanding of the history of this case and the merits of the
19
proposed attorneys’ fees motion and to allow the Undersigned Parties to complete the process
20
required by Local Rule 54-5(b)(1) and attempt to resolve whether the Undersigned Defendants
21
are entitled to Plaintiff’s payment of their attorneys’ fees.
22
6.
Because of Mr. Fayard’s recent retention, the substantial work required to brief an
23
attorneys’ fees motion should one be necessary, and counsel’s existing scheduling limitations,
24
the Undersigned Parties wish to agree to a mutually convenient schedule for submitting any bill
25
of costs and for briefing and hearing any attorneys’ fees motion.
26
27
28
7.
The Undersigned Parties agree that the interest of judicial economy and
convenience of the Undersigned Parties would be furthered by setting, and ask the Court to set,
-2-
STIPULATION SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND HEARING (L.R. 6-1)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
101897427\V-6
1
the following schedule, which Mr. Fayard has confirmed is acceptable to him:
2
a. Motion(s) for attorney’s fees and any bill(s) of costs due November 30, 2016;
3
b. Opposition brief(s) to motion(s) for attorney’s fees due December 22, 2016;
4
c. Reply brief(s) on motion(s) for attorney’s fees due January 10, 2017; and
5
d. Hearing on the motion(s) for attorney’s fees on January 26, 2017, or another
6
7
date convenient to the Court.
8.
This time modification will not effect the schedule of this case, and serves to
8
enlarge the time allowed for a motion for attorney’s fees and filing of a bill of costs under Fed.
9
R. Civ. P. 54(d). (See L.R. Civ. 6-2(a)(3).)
10
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA
SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
11
Respectfully submitted,
12
13
Dated: November 15, 2016
/s/ Ian R. Barker
Ian R. Barker
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant Ceiba Legal, LLP
16
17
DENTONS US LLP
Dated: November 15, 2016
DURAN LAW OFFICE
18
/s/ Jack Duran, Jr.
Jack Duran, Jr.
19
20
Attorneys for Plaintiff Elem Indian Colony of
Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND HEARING (L.R. 6-1)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
101897427\V-6
1
Dated: November 15, 2016
BRADY & VINDING
2
/s/ Michael Brady
Michael Brady
3
4
Attorneys for Defendants Michael Hunter,
Anthony Steele, David Brown, Adrian John,
Natalie Sedano Garcia, and Kiuya Brown
5
6
Dated: November 15, 2016
CEIBA LEGAL, LLP
7
8
/s/ Little Fawn Boland
Little Fawn Boland
9
Attorneys for Defendants David Brown, Adrian
John, Natalie Sedano Garcia, and Kiuya Brown
10
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA
SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND HEARING (L.R. 6-1)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
101897427\V-6
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURES
1
2
I, Ian R. Barker, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint
3
Stipulation Extending Defendants’ Time to Respond to the Complaint. In compliance with Local
4
Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in this filing.
5
6
7
Dated: November 15, 2016
DENTONS US LLP
8
/s/ Ian R. Barker
Ian R. Barker
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
Ceiba Legal, LLP
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA
SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
STIPULATION SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND HEARING (L.R. 6-1)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
101897427\V-6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
The Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing, orders as
3
follows:
4
1. The Undersigned Defendants are granted leave to file motion(s) for attorney’s fees
5
and any bill(s) of costs on or before November 30, 2016.
6
2. Plaintiff is granted leave to oppose the motion(s) for attorney’s fees on or before
December 22, 2016. December 14, 2016.
7
8
3. The Undersigned Defendants are granted leave to file reply brief(s) to Plaintiff’s
9
opposition(s) to the motion(s) for attorney’s fees on or before January 10, 2017.
December 21, 2016.
4. The motion for attorney’s fees is set for hearing before this Court on January 26,
10
2017. January 5, 2017.
DENTONS US LLP
ONE MARKET PLAZA
SPEAR TOWER, 24TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
11
12
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION (AS MODIFIED), IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
November 16, 2016.
Dated: _____________________
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6-
STIPULATION SETTING SCHEDULE FOR (1) FILING BILL OF COSTS AND (2) MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BRIEFING AND HEARING (L.R. 6-1)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03081-WHA
101897427\V-6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?