Herbert et al v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Cordis Corporation to File Reply In Support Of Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Strike filed by Cordis Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 5, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

CROWELL & MORING LLP
Kevin C. Mayer (CSB No. 118177)
Email: [e-mail]
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415.986.2800
Facsimile:
415.628.5116
Andrew D. Kaplan (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Rebecca B. Chaney (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
E-mail: [e-mail]
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone:
202.624.2500
Facsimile:
202.628.5116
Attorneys for Defendant Cordis Corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

WALTER HERBERT, et al.,

15

Plaintiffs,

16
17
18

v.

Case No. 3:16-cv-03085-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME

CORDIS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND TIME FOR CORDIS’ REPLY;
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03085-JST

1

On GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the parties’ joint stipulation to extend time for defendant

2

Cordis Corporation to file its reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

3

Cordis Corporation shall file its reply brief on or before July 8, 2016.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

July 5, 2016
Dated: _______________________________

______________________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND TIME FOR CORDIS’ REPLY;
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03085-JST