Herbert et al v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 27

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 14 MOTION to Remand filed by Cynthia Martinez, Russell Anderson, John Shaffer, Jr., Ted Michael Martinez, Timothy Howard, Allison Fisher, Judy Shaffer, Walter Herbert, Clarice Stepp, Martha Graham, Tamarra Grayson, Frank Graham. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 19, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 WALTER HERBERT, et al., Case No. 16-cv-03085-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 CORDIS CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF No. 14 Defendants. 8 Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Based on Lack of Subject Matter 10 Jurisdiction. ECF No. 14. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on 12 this matter, currently scheduled for July 28, 2016, is hereby VACATED. 13 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 14 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 15 been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 16 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 17 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 18 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 19 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2016 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?