Vaughn E Crawford v. City of Union City et al

Filing 31

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said action be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, tha t the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/14/16. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
VAUGHN E. CRAWFORD,

No. C- 16-3094 TEH

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

13
CITY OF UNION CITY, et al.,
14

Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

/

The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the
above-titled action,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said action be dismissed without prejudice; provided,
however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of
service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the
settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this action
shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 14, 2016
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2