Todd Johnston v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2016. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 11/17/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/29/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Michael L. Slack (Texas Bar No. 18476800)
[e-mail]
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
John R. Davis (Cal. Bar No. 308412)
[e-mail]
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
SLACK & DAVIS, LLP
2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 220
Austin, TX 78746

10

Thomas J. Brandi (Cal. Bar No. 53208)
[e-mail]
Brian J. Malloy (Cal. Bar No. 234882)
[e-mail]
THE BRANDI LAW FIRM
354 Pine Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415-989-1800

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Johnston

7
8
9

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TODD JOHNSTON, individually and on
) Case No. 3:16-cv-3134-EMC
behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ) [Related to Case No. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC]
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
vs.
) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
)
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware )
Corporation,
) Judge:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
) Courtroom: 5
Defendant.
)
)
Related to:
)
O’Connor et al. v. Uber Tech., Inc., No. 3:13- )
cv-3826-EMC
)
)
)

27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:16-cv-3134-EMC

1

STIPULATION

2

1. WHEREAS, an initial case management conference was originally set for September 29, 2016;

3

2. WHEREAS, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a motion to stay proceedings, with a hearing

4
5
6

date of September 22, 2016;
3. WHEREAS, on August 12, 2016, the initial case management conference was continued to October
27, 2016;

7

4. WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff Todd Johnston has a conflict with the October 27, 2016 date;

8

5. WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred on alternative dates in which counsel for both sides

9
10

are available based on the Court’s Scheduling Notes on availability; and
6. WHEREAS, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the initial case management

11

conference be continued to the earlier available date of November 17, December 1, December 8 or

12

December 15, 2016.

13

Dated: August 24, 2016

14

/s/ Emily E. O’Connor
CARLOS JIMENEZ
EMILY E. O’CONNOR
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

15
16
17
18

Dated: August 24, 2016

19
20
21
22
23

/s/ Brian J. Malloy
THOMAS J. BRANDI
BRIAN J. MALLOY
THE BRANDI LAW FIRM
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TODD JOHNSTON

24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:16-cv-3134-EMC

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

November 17,2016
The initial case management conference is continued from October 27, 2016 to _______________.
at 9:30 a.m. A joint CMC statement shall be filed by November 10, 2016.

ER

H

10
11

R NIA

dward
Judge E

n

M. Che

FO

RT

9

NO

8

LI

7

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO

A

6

RT
U
O

5

___________________________________
S DISTRICT
TE
Hon.A
Edward M. Chen C
T
United States District Judge

8/29/2016
Dated:_________

S

4

UNIT
ED

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:16-cv-3134-EMC

1
2
3

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Brian J. Malloy, attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained.

4
5
6

/s/ Brian J. Malloy
BRIAN J. MALLOY

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:16-cv-3134-EMC