Todd Johnston v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 80 to Adjourn Case Management Conference filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2018. Further Case Management Conference reset for 1/18/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/17/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 KEITH A. JACOBY, Bar No. 150233 kjacoby@littler.com CARLOS JIMENEZ, Bar No. 227534 cajimenez@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067.3107 Telephone: 310.553.0308 Facsimile: 310.553.5583 ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998 aspurchise@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 900 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022.3298 Telephone: 212.583.9600 Facsimile: 212.832.2719 SOPHIA BEHNIA, Bar No. 289318 sbehnia@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [Additional Counsel Listed on Follow Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 TODD JOHNSTON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:16-CV-03134-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Current CMC Date: November 30, 2017 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Complaint Filed: June 9, 2016 Defendant. 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST 5TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 310.553.0308 JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03134-EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM Thomas J. Brandi, SBN 53208 tjb@brandilaw.com Brian J. Malloy, SBN 234882 bjm@brandilaw.com 354 Pine Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 941 04 415.989.1800 SLACK & DAVIS, LLP Michael L. Slack, pro hac vice mslack@slackdavis. com John R. Davis, SBN 308412 jdavis@slackdavis .com 2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 220 Austin, TX 78746 Attorneys for Plaintiff TODD JOHNSTON 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST 5TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 310.553.0308 JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03134-EMC STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Todd Johnston (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Uber 3 Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) (Plaintiff and Defendant are collectively referred to as “the Parties”), by 4 and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 5 WHEREAS, on June 22, 2017, the Court stayed the above-captioned case pending the 6 outcome of various appeals in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 7 Case Nos. 14-16078, et al. related to the enforceability of arbitration agreements at issue in this case; 8 WHEREAS, on September 22, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed O’Connor v. 9 Uber Technologies, Inc., Case Nos. 14-16078, et al. pending Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 10 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-300) (“Morris”), consolidated 11 with Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016), cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 12 16-285) and Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. NLRB, 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13 13, 2017) (No. 16-307) (collectively, “Morris, et al.”); 14 WHEREAS, as a result of meet and confer efforts, the Parties agree that the November 30, 15 2017 Case Management Conference should be adjourned until after the United States Supreme Court 16 has issued its decision in Morris, et al.; 17 WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that judicial and party resources would be conserved, 18 and other efficiencies would be gained, if the November 30, 2017 Case Management Conference 19 was adjourned pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Morris, et al.; 20 WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that neither would be prejudiced by a delay in 21 proceedings until after Morris and the consolidated cases are decided given that this case is already 22 stayed pending the appeals in O’Connor, which are stayed pending a ruling in Morris, et al. 23 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that: 24 1. The November 30, 2017 Case Management Conference is adjourned pending the 25 Supreme Court’s decision in Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. 26 granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-300) (“Morris”), consolidated with Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 27 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016), cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-285) and Murphy Oil USA, 28 Inc. v. NLRB, 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-307). LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST 5TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 310.553.0308 JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03134-EMC 1 2 3 2. The Parties shall file a joint status report and proposal for setting a Case Management Conference within fourteen days of the decision in Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP. IT IS SO STIPULATED 4 5 Dated: November 16, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 6 /s/ Sophia Behnia SOPHIA BEHNIA LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 7 8 9 10 Dated: November 16, 2017 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM 11 /s/ Brian J. Malloy BRIAN J. MALLOY Attorneys for Plaintiff TODD JOHNSTON 12 13 14 15 16 17 I, Sophia Behnia, hereby attest that Mr. Malloy, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. /s/ Sophia Behnia 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST 5TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 310.553.0308 JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2. CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03134-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 1. The November 30, 2017 Case Management Conference is adjourned pending the 4 Supreme Court’s decision in Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. 5 granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-300) (“Morris”), consolidated with Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 6 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016), cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-285) and Murphy Oil USA, 7 Inc. v. NLRB, 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-307). 2. 8 9 The Parties shall file a joint status report and proposal for setting a Case Management Conference within fourteen days of the decision in Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Further CMC reset for 1/18/18 at 10:30 a.m. 11 11/17 , 2017 ISTR 14 15 16 RT dwar Judge E ER 19 Firmwide:151247213.2 073208.1219 A H 18 en d M. Ch NO 17 20 D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF AS MO LI UNIT ED S 13 RT U O ICT SD The Honorable Edward M. Chen TE C United States District Judge TA R NIA Dated: FO 12 N D IS T IC T R OF C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST 5TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 310.553.0308 JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3. CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03134-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?