Sentegra, LLC v. Asus Computer International

Filing 116

ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING RECORD. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/20/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Li Chen (admitted pro hac) lchen@chenmalin.com Dwayne C. Norton (admitted pro hac) dnorton@chenmalin.com Michael Fagan (admitted pro hac) mfagan@chenmalin.com Chen Malin LLP 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2400 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 627-9950 Fax: (214) 627-9940 Vinay V. Joshi (Cal. Bar No. 213487) vjoshi@atwiplaw.com Amin Turocy & Watson LLP 160 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 975 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (650) 618-6481 Fax: (216) 696-8731 Attorneys for Defendant ASUS Computer International UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 Sentegra, LLC, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 vs. ASUS Computer International, Defendant. ) ) Case Number: 3:16-cv-03136-WHA ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ___________________________________________________________________________ Case No. 3:16-cv-03136-WHA 1 During the December 14, 2016 evidentiary hearing before this Court, counsel for 2 Defendant ASUS Computer International (“Defendant”) and for Plaintiff Sentegra LLC 3 (“Sentegra”) represented that the parties had agreed to pre-admit Defendant’s Exhibits 1–9 and 4 15–20. Dkt. 111 at 9:10–10:12. Accordingly, those Exhibits became part of the record of this 5 proceeding. The Court hereby modifies the record as follows: 6 Defendant’s Exhibits 17, 18, 19, and 20 are stricken from the record, as they do not exist. 7 Plaintiff’s Exhibits 19 and 20, which were included in Defendant’s exhibit binder at the December 8 14, 2016 evidentiary hearing, remain part of the record. 9 10 11 Date: December 20, 2016. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ___________________________________________________________________________ Case No. 3:16-cv-03136-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?