Katherine Oster v. Caithness Corporation et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting 44 Joint Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order. Close of Fact Discovery due by 4/14/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/28/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2017)

1 J. Gary Gwilliam (SBN. 33430)
Randall E. Strauss (SBN. 168363)
2 Jayme L. Walker (SBN. 273159)
3 GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER
1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600
Oakland, CA 94612
4
Phone: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
6
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
7
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATHERINE OSTER
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14 KATHERINE OSTER,
15

Case No.: 3:16-CV-03164-WHO

Plaintiff,

16 vs.

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER

17

CAITHNESS CORPORATION; CAITHNESS
18 ENERGY, LLC; CAITHNESS
DEVELOPMENT, LLC; LESLIE GELBER;
19
and DOES 1-50,
Defendant.
20

TRIAL DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2017

On December 21, 2016, this Court issued a Civil Pretrial Order setting this matter for Trial

21

22 (Docket No. 34). The Court set trial for November 6, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. and a final pretrial
23 conference on October 10, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. The Court also set “all corresponding Pretrial
24 Deadlines.” Pursuant to the following stipulation, the parties now seek to modify the Scheduling
25 Order.
26 ///
27 ///
28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties hereto, through their respective
STIP TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

1

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03164-WHO

1 counsel of record, that the dates and pretrial deadlines be continued as follows:
2

1. The parties agree that fact discovery is extended to April 14, 2017.

3

2. The parties agree that Rule 26 export reports are due April 28, 2017.

4

3. The parties agree that rebuttal expert reports are due May 12, 2017.

5

4. The parties agree that expert discovery will close June 9, 2017.

6

5. Defendants will file any dispositive motions by June 23, 2017.

7

6. Plaintiff will file her opposition to any dispositive motion by July 7, 2017.

8

7. Defendants will file their reply by July 19, 2017.

9

8. All other dates in the original scheduling order will remain the same.

10
11

9. If the court cannot accommodate the briefing schedule proposed for dispositive motions,
the parties request a conference call.

12 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
13
14
15 DATED: _________

________________________

16

Attorneys for Plaintiff Katherine Oster

17
18
19 DATED: _____ ____

______________________
Attorneys for Defendants Caithness
Corporation, Caithness Energy, L.L.C.,
Caithness Development, LLC and Leslie
Gelber

20
21
22

23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25 DATED: March 28, 2017

___________________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
STIP TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

2

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03164-WHO