Aquino v. Rasavi et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference 90 Days. Case Management Statement due by 5/30/2017. Case Management Conference continued to 6/6/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/01/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2017)

Download PDF
1 Phillip Babich (SBN 269577) Email: pbabich@reedsmith.com 2 Thuy T. Nguyen (SBN 313144) Email: tnguyen@reedsmith.com 3 REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 543 8700 5 Facsimile: (415) 391 8269 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jorge Aquino 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JORGE AQUINO, 13 14 Plaintiff, v. 15 E. RASAVI, D.D.S., 16 Defendant. Case No: 3:16cv3167-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick Action Filed: June 6, 2016 17 18 19 Plaintiff Jorge Aquino and Defendant Eric Razavi hereby stipulate that the Case 20 Management Conference set for March 7, 2017, be continued ninety (90) days and request that the 21 Court so order. This stipulation and request are made jointly based on the following: 22 1. The Case Management Conference is set for March 7, 2017 [Dkt. No. 15]. In 23 advance of the conference, the parties are required, per rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules 24 of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Case Management Order dated December 13, 25 2016, to prepare and file a joint Case Management Conference Statement by February 26 27, 2017. 27 28 2. On January 5, 2017, the Court appointed Phillip Babich and Thuy Nguyen from Reed Smith LLP for the limited purpose of representing Plaintiff in the course of a STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS settlement conference [Dkt. No. 18]. 1 2 3. Plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel have engaged in a meet and confer discussion 3 regarding a discovery plan and the case generally. The parties agree that more time is 4 needed to prepare for a potential settlement, and that it would be premature to draft a 5 joint Case Management Conference Statement until settlement talks have concluded. 6 4. Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate to and request that the Case Management 7 Conference of March 7, 2017 be continued ninety (90) days and that all related Rule 8 26 obligations be stayed until the Court sets a new date for the Case Management 9 Conference. REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 It is So Stipulated. 12 Dated: January 27, 2017 13 By 14 15 16 17 18 19 REED SMITH LLP Dated: January 27, 2017 Phillip Babich Thuy T. Nguyen Attorneys for Plaintiff Jorge Aquino DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL By /s/ Harry T. Gower Harry T. Gower Attorney for Defendant Eric Razavi, D.D.S. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2– STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 JORGE AQUINO, Case No: 3:16cv3167-WHO 4 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS Plaintiff, 5 6 7 v. Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick E. RASAVI, D.D.S., Action Filed: June 6, 2016 Defendant. 8 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 Upon consideration of the stipulation and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 12 ORDERED that: 13 (1) The Case Management Conference, currently set for March 7, 2017, be vacated. 14 (2) The Case Management Conference is continued to June 6, 2017. 15 (3) A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed no later than May 30, 16 2017. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: February 1, 2017 20 WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3– STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?