Erina Llamas v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEADLINES ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT. Motions to be heard by 7/19/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/31/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

Download PDF
Anna Martin (Bar No. 154279) 1 amartin@mmhllp.com Grant Ingram (Bar No. 242785) 2 gingram@mmhllp.com MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 3 800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90017-2611 4 Telephone: (213) 620-0300 Facsimile: (213) 625-1930 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 7 Scott Kalkin 8 ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN 369 Pine Street, Suite 820 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. (415) 732-0282 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 ERINA LLAMAS 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 ERINA LLAMAS, Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 21 NORTH AMERICA, 22 Defendant. 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv-03293-WHO ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEADLINES ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT; ORDER 24 25 Having considered the stipulated motion for a new briefing schedule, and the associated 26 declaration of counsel, and finding good cause, the Court hereby affirms the following new briefing 27 schedule: 28 LAW OFFICES 1 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 155535.1 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE DEADLINES 1 Schedule Current Dates Stipulated New Dates 2 Opening Brief Due April 26, 2017 June 7, 2017 3 Opposition Briefs Due May 10, 2017 June 28, 2017 4 Reply Briefs Due May 17, 2017 July 5, 2017 5 Hearing Date May 31, 2017 July 19, 2017 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED: 8 9 Dated: March 31, 2017 10 _________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES 2 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 155535.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?