Erina Llamas v. Life Insurance Company of North America
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEADLINES ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT. Motions to be heard by 7/19/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/31/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)
Anna Martin (Bar No. 154279)
1 amartin@mmhllp.com
Grant Ingram (Bar No. 242785)
2 gingram@mmhllp.com
MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP
3 800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
Los Angeles, California 90017-2611
4 Telephone: (213) 620-0300
Facsimile: (213) 625-1930
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH
AMERICA
7
Scott Kalkin
8 ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN
369 Pine Street, Suite 820
9 San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. (415) 732-0282
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11 ERINA LLAMAS
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
ERINA LLAMAS,
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
21 NORTH AMERICA,
22
Defendant.
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:16-cv-03293-WHO
ORDER RE:
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEADLINES ON CROSS
MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT;
ORDER
24
25
Having considered the stipulated motion for a new briefing schedule, and the associated
26 declaration of counsel, and finding good cause, the Court hereby affirms the following new briefing
27 schedule:
28
LAW OFFICES
1
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
155535.1
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE DEADLINES
1 Schedule
Current Dates
Stipulated New Dates
2 Opening Brief Due
April 26, 2017
June 7, 2017
3 Opposition Briefs Due
May 10, 2017
June 28, 2017
4 Reply Briefs Due
May 17, 2017
July 5, 2017
5 Hearing Date
May 31, 2017
July 19, 2017
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED:
8
9 Dated: March 31, 2017
10
_________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
2
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
155535.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?