E.D.C. Technologies, Inc. v. Seidel et al
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT FRED KLINZMANN PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/8/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)
S
7
R NIA
LI
ER
Attorney for Defendant
FRED KLINZMANN
FO
u
Judge S
H
6
RT
5
on
san Illst
NO
4
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
3
UNIT
ED
2
George B. Piggott (SBN 68227)
a member of GEORGE B. PIGGOTT,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2603 Main Street, Ninth Floor
Irvine, California 92614-6232
Tel.: (949) 261-0500
Fax: (949) 261-1085
Email: gbpapc@aol.com
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
(second request)
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
E.D.C. TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No. 3:16-cv-03316-SI
JUDGE:
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
COURTROOM: 1
v.
JIM SEIDEL, an individual, JASON
PAVLOS, an individual, FRED
KLINZMANN, an individual, SEIDEL
ASSOCIATES, LLC, a California limited
liability company, GREENBOX ENERGY, a
business organization, form unknown, and
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF
AND DEFENDANT FRED KLINZMANN
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)
ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: June 15, 2016
Defendants.
22
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) of the United States District Court, Northern District of
24
California, Plaintiff E.D.C. Technologies, Inc. (“EDC”) and Defendant Fred Klinzmann
25
(“Klinzmann”), by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an
26
extension of time for Klinzmann to answer or otherwise respond to EDC’s complaint.
27
Klinzmann’s response to EDC’s complaint shall now be due or before August 19, 2016. The
28
parties previously stipulated to an extension to August 5, 2016. This stipulation does not alter
1
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)
Case No. 3:16-cv_03313-SI
1
2
3
the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
Counsel for Klinzmann also attests, pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), that concurrence in the
filing of this document was obtained from each of the document’s signatories.
4
SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP
5
6
DATED: August _, 2016
s/Michael W. Stebbins
Attorneys for Plaintiff
E.D.C. TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DATED: August 5, 2016
/s/George B. Piggott
George B. Piggott
a member of GEORGE B. PIGGOTT,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Attorney for Defendant FRED KLINZMANN
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)
Case No. 3:16-cv_03313-SI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18)
years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 2603 Main Street, Ninth Floor, Irvine,
California 92614.
On August 5, 2016, I served electronically the following document(s) described as:
STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT FRED KLINZMANN
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
8
[ X ] BY ELECTRONIC FILING
9
Electronic filing of the above described document(s) was made through the CM/ECF system
in accordance with Rule 5 of the Local Rules for the United States District court for the Northern
District of California to the following:
10
11
12
13
14
Michael W. Stebbins
Counsel for Plaintiff
mws@svlg.com
Gabriel S. Spooner
Counsel for Defendants
Jim Seidel and Seidel Associates,
L.L.C. dba GreenBox Energy
gspooner@shb.com
15
16
17
18
I declare that I am a member of the bar of this court, and in accordance with 28 USC §1746, I
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is
true and correct.
Executed on August 5, 2016, at Irvine, California.
19
20
/s/ George B. Piggott
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?