E.D.C. Technologies, Inc. v. Seidel et al

Filing 95

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 2/14/18. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 E.D.C. TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California ) Case No.: 3:16-cv-03316 SI ) Corporation, ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) JIM SEIDEL, et al, ) ) Defendants. ) ) _____________________________________ ) ) JIM SEIDEL, et al, ) ) Counterclaimants, ) ) vs. ) ) E.D.C. TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al, ) ) Counter-Defendants. ) ) ) 18 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 19 20 Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant E.D.C. Technologies, Inc., and Counterclaim- 21 Defendants SaveGas, Inc., Terry Pfaff and Jennifer Wathen (collectively, “EDC Parties”), on the 22 one hand, and Defendants/Counterclaimants Jim Seidel and Seidel Associates, LLC dba 23 GreenBox Energy, and Defendant Jason Pavlos (collectively, “GBE Parties”), on the other hand, 24 by and through their respective counsel, have stipulated and agreed that the above-captioned action 25 shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41. 26 27 28 By request of the EDC Parties and the GBE Parties, the Court hereby expressly retains jurisdiction to enforce the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release _____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL & [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 10509418 1 between and among them, dated February 9, 2018 (the “Settlement Agreement”), in accordance 2 with Section 1.c. thereof. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: 7 2/14/18 Hon. Susan Ilston UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL & [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 10509418

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?