Wilson, Jr. v. Muniz

Filing 23

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE OF ELECTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/23/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
FREDERICK WILSON, JR.,

10

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
v.

12

Case No. 16-cv-03366-JSC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
TO FILE NOTICE OF ELECTION

WILLIAM L. MUNIZ,

13

Defendant.

14
15

INTRODUCTION

16

Plaintiff, a prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed this pro se civil action

17
18

against the SVSP Warden, William L. Muniz.1 For the reasons explained below, the complaint is

19

ordered served upon Defendant.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY

20
21

Plaintiff first filed his claims on a federal habeas petition form in the United States District

22

Court for the Eastern District of California. The Eastern District transferred the case to the Central

23

District of California, where Plaintiff was directed to clarify the nature of the action he sought to

24

bring because the pleadings were confusing. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff acknowledged that he

25

incorrectly used the federal habeas form to present his claim because he was sent that form by the

26

Eastern District. (ECF No. 7at 2; ECF No. 8 at 2.) The Honorable Dale S. Fischer of the Central

27
1

28

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(c). (ECF No. 14.)

1

District of California found that Plaintiff wished to pursue a civil action --- not a habeas petition --

2

- because the gravamen of Plaintiff’s claim is that prison authorities are collecting on a debt

3

illegally under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and he is not challenging his conviction or

4

confinement. (ECF No. 8.) The case was transferred back to the Eastern District of California,

5

which then transferred the case to this court because SVSP, where Defendant is located and the

6

actions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims took place, is located in this District. (ECF Nos. 8, 11.)
STANDARD OF REVIEW

7
8

Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek
redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §

10

1915A(a). The Court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

9

the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief

12

may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id.

13

§ 1915A(b). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901

14

F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990).

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the
claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” “Specific facts are not necessary; the
statement need only give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . . claim is and the grounds upon
which it rests.” Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007) (citations omitted). Although to
state a claim a complaint “does not need detailed factual allegations, . . . a plaintiff’s obligation to
provide the grounds of his entitle[ment] to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a
formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do. . . . Factual allegations must
be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
127 S. Ct. 1955, 1964-65 (2007) (citations omitted). A complaint must proffer “enough facts to
state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Id. at 1974.
LEGAL CLAIMS

25

When liberally construed, Plaintiff’s allegations state a cognizable claim that Defendant

26
William Muniz violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p) by
27

causing prison officials to collect on a debt improperly and without “validation.” However, before

28
2

1

construing a pro se habeas petition as a civil complaint, a district court must advise the prisoner of

2

the consequences of construing a habeas petition as a civil complaint and provide an opportunity

3

to withdraw or amend the complaint. Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 936 (9th Cir. 2016) (en

4

banc). Plaintiff was not warned by the Central or Eastern Districts about the consequences of

5

proceeding with his claims in a civil action instead of a habeas petition. (See ECF Nos. 6, 8, 11.)

6

Consequently, before this Court allows Plaintiff to proceed with this case as a civil action, Plaintiff

7

is warned that doing so will subject him to the “three strikes,” exhaustion, and in forma pauperis

8

provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. These provisions are set forth here:
(1) 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

judgment in a civil action or proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (i.e., may not proceed in forma
pauperis) "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any
facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the
grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,
unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury;"
(2) 42 U.S.C. § 1997e provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison

15
16
17
18
19
20

conditions under [] Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional
facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted;”
(3) even though Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) he
will be required to pay the full amount of the filing fee of $350.00 by way of an "installment plan"
that operates as follows: (1) first, the court will assess and collect a partial filing fee from the
prisoner;7 (2) after payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner will be required to make
monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account.
CONCLUSION
Within 28 days of the date this order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a notice with the Court

21
indicating whether he elects to: (1) proceed with this action as a civil action notwithstanding the
22
foregoing consequences of doing so; (2) voluntarily dismiss this action; or (3) amend the petition
23
to state a claim that is cognizable in a federal habeas petition. If Plaintiff does not file such a
24

notice, this case will be dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff bringing his claims in a civil

25
26
27
28

7

The amount of the partial filing fee is equal to 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly
deposits to the prisoner's account for the last six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the
prisoner's account for the last six months. See id. § 1915(b)(1).
3

1
2
3

action at a future date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 23, 2016

4
5
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FREDERICK WILSON, JR.,

Case No. 16-cv-03366-JSC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

9
10

WILLIAM L. MUNIZ,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on November 23, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

18
19
20

Frederick Wilson, Jr. ID: Prisoner Id F-29297
High Desert State Prison
P.O. Box 3030
Susanville, CA 96127-3030

21
22
23

Dated: November 23, 2016

24
25

Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court

26
27
28

By:________________________
Ada Means, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
5