Marilyn D Mintz v. Subaru of America, Inc.

Filing 38

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 26, 2016, is continued to D ecember 2, 2016, at 10:30 a.m.; an updated Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than November 23, 2016. Initial disclosures shall be provided no later than 14 days after the Court issues its ruling on defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 20, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARILYN D. MINTZ, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Case No. 16-cv-03384-MMC ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES 12 13 In light of the pending motion to dismiss, the Case Management Conference 14 currently scheduled for September 26, 2016, is hereby CONTINUED to December 2, 15 2016, at 10:30 a.m.; an updated Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later 16 than November 23, 2016. 17 18 19 Given the above revised schedule, the parties' Stipulated Request for Telephonic Appearance is hereby DENIED as moot. Lastly, the Court having considered the parties' dispute as to the timing of initial 20 disclosures (see Joint Case Management Statement, filed September 16, 2016), the 21 previously set deadline is hereby EXTENDED; said disclosures shall be provided no later 22 than 14 days after the Court issues its ruling on defendant's motion to dismiss. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 20, 2016 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?