Kaufman et al v. International Long Shore and Warehouse Union et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS FOR PROPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Pacific Maritime Association, International Long Shore and Warehouse Union. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 22, 2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 RONNIE KAUFMAN, ALPHONCE JACKSON, Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 16 17 Case No. 16-cv-03386-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS FOR PROPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INTERNATIONAL LONG SHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, et al., and PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKI US LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS Case No. 16-cv-03386-JST ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SILI CON VA LL EY DB2/ 31480167.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 The Court, having considered the Defendants’ Stipulation and Request for Extension of 3 Page Limits for Proposed Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (“Stipulation”), and for good 4 cause appearing, hereby orders as follows: 5 If the Defendants file a Joint Motion for Summary Judgment, then the page limitation for 6 such Joint Motion for Summary Judgment shall be extended to a maximum of thirty (30) pages 7 and the page limitation for Defendants’ Joint Reply shall be extended to a maximum of twenty 8 (20) pages. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED:________________ May 22, 2017 12 ____________________________________ HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKI US LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW 1 PALO AL TO DB2/ 31480167.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS Case No. 16-cv-03386-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?