Brunker v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Filing 44

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Stipulation For Extension of Time to Conduct Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244) ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245) ACE T. TATE, ESQ. (SBN 262015) MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT A Professional Corporation 1912 “I” Street Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: (916) 446-4692 Facsimile: (916) 447-4614 davidm@mastagni.com istevens@mastagni.com atate@mastagni.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT VICKI R. NUETZEL (SBN 115124) Email: vnuetze@bart.gov SAM N. DAWOOD (SBN 178862) Email: sdawood@bart.gov 300 Lakeside Drive, 23rd Floor Oakland, California 94612-3534 Tel: (510) 464-6050 Fax: (510) 464-6049 Attorneys for Defendant 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 JODI BRUNKER, et al., on behalf of herself and all similarly situated individuals, 19 Plaintiffs, v. 20 21 22 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant. 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv-03399-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT PRIVATE ADR 24 Pursuant to the Court’s August 31, 2016 Order Granting Stipulation re Private ADR (Dkt. 25 No. 28), the parties have a deadline of November 29, 2016 to conduct private ADR. The parties 26 have been working diligently towards informal exchange of information, facilitated notification 27 to putative plaintiffs, and selection of a mediator to ensure a productive mediation session. 28 Mediation is presently scheduled for January 27, 2017 before the Hon. Raul A. Ramirez, Judge STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT ADR 1 BRUNKER, et al. v. SF BART DISTRICT Case No. 3:16-cv-03399-HSG 1 Retired. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request an extension of time to comply with the 2 Court’s Order re Private ADR, up to and including February 1, 2017. 3 4 5 Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 29, 2016 By: /s/ Ace T. Tate DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. ACE T. TATE, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, APC Dated: November 29, 2016 10 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 11 By: /s/ Vicki R. Nuetzel VICKI R. NUETZEL, ESQ. SAM N. DAWOOD, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties may have until February 1, 2017 to conduct private ADR in this matter. 19 20 DATED: November 30, 2016 21 _________________________________ HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT ADR 2 BRUNKER, et al. v. SF BART DISTRICT Case No. 3:16-cv-03399-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?