Dalton v. J. Mann, Inc.
Filing
41
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 40 filed by Bryan Dalton. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/30/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
SHUKLA LAW
P.BOBBY SHUKLA SBN 229736
353 Sacramento Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel:
(415) 986-1338
GORDON & REES, LLP
JOAN C. WOODARD ( N0. 129710)
655 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Phone: 916-830-6512
Fax: 916-920-4402
Email: jwoodard@gordonrees.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
BRYAN DALTON
5
Attorney for Defendant
J. MANN INC.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
BRYAN DALTON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 16-CV-03409-EMC
v.
J. MANN INC., and DOES ONE through
TWENTY, inclusive,
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICEW AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
14
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
The parties, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby
stipulate that the above-captioned case can be dismissed with prejudice, the parties to bear
their respective costs, including attorney fees or other expenses of litigation.
20
21
Dated: May 9, 2017
22
23
SHUKLA LAW
By:
/s/ P. Bobby Shukla
P. BOBBY SHUKLA
Attorney for Plaintiff
BRYAN DALTON
24
25
Dated: May 9, 2017
By:
26
/s/ Joan C. Woodard
JOAN C. WOODARD
Attorney for Defendant
J. MANN INC.
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.:16-CV-03409-EMC
1
ORDER
2
5
parties to bear their respective costs, including attorney fees or other expenses of litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
S
5/30/17
DATED: ____________
UNIT
ED
7
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
__________________________________________________
ERED
O ORD JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATESSDISTRICT
IT IS
9
dwa
Judge E
12
A
H
ER
LI
RT
11
hen
rd M. C
NO
10
R NIA
4
It is hereby ordered and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice, the
FO
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.:16-CV-03409-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?