AFT Local 2121 et al v. Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges

Filing 63

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 59 Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of Briefs on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 KENNETH E. KELLER [SBN 71450] kkeller@ksrh.com THOMAS H. SLOAN, JR. [SBN 58322] tsloan@ksrh.com JENNIFER R. MCGLONE [SBN 209228] jmcglone@ksrh.com ETHAN I. JACOBS [SBN 291838] ejacobs@ksrh.com KELLER, SLOAN, ROMAN & HOLLAND LLP 555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 249-8330 Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 LAURENCE W. KESSENICK [SBN 45433] lkessenick@kgf-lawfirm.com SCOTT C. KESSENICK [SBN 295999] skessenick@kgf-lawfirm.com KESSENICK, GAMMA, & FREE, LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3880 San Francisco, CA 94014 Telephone: (415) 362-9400 Facsimile: (415) 352-9401 Attorneys for Defendant Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STEPHEN P. BERZON [SBN 46540] sberzon@altber.com EILEEN B. GOLDSMITH [SBN 218029] egoldsmith@altber.com PEDER J. V. THOREEN [SBN 217081] pthoreen@altber.com MEREDITH A. JOHNSON [SBN 291018] mjohnson@altber.com REBECCA C. LEE [SBN 305119] rlee@altber.com Altshuler Berzon LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 ROBERT J. BEZEMEK [SBN 058740] rjbezemek@bezemeklaw.com DAVID CONWAY [SBN 253903] dconway@bezemeklaw.com Law Offices of Robert J. Bezemek A Professional Corporation The Latham Square Building 1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 936 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 763-5690 Facsimile: (510) 763-4255 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-03411-HSG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AFT LOCAL 2121; PALOMAR FACULTY FEDERATION, AFT LOCAL 6161; MENDOCINO COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFT LOCAL 6322; AND SAN JOSE-EVERGREEN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFT LOCAL 6157, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR MEMBERS TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 3543.8; CALIFORNIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, ALISA MESSER; TIM KILLIKELLY; KAREN SAGINOR; SHANNON LIENHART; SHANELL WILLIAMS; AUGUSTA GOLDSTEIN, Case No. 3:16-cv-03411 HSG JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT ACCJC’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, 11 12 vs. 13 ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR COMMUNITY AND JUNIOR COLLEGES, et al., 14 15 Defendants. 16 STIPULATION 17 18 Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Defendant 19 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (“ACCJC”) and Plaintiffs AFT Local 20 2121; Palomar Faculty Federation, AFT Local 6161, Mendocino College Federation of Teachers, 21 AFT Local 6322, San Jose-Evergreen Federation of Teachers, AFT Local 6157, California 22 Federation of Teachers, Alisa Messer, Tim Killikelly, Karen Saginor, Shannon Lienhart, Shanell 23 Williiams, and Augusta Goldstein (“Plaintiffs”) respectfully stipulate as follows: 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint in this action on November 4, 2016 (D.I. 57, the “SAC”); WHEREAS, Defendant ACCJC currently has up to and including December 5, 2016 to answer, move, and/or otherwise respond to the SAC; WHEREAS, the SAC is voluminous, asserting seven separate causes of action and including 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-03411-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 326 numbered paragraphs on 76 pages; WHEREAS, Defendant has indicated that it will move to dismiss all seven causes of action in the SAC; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, and through their respective attorneys of record and subject to order of the Court, as follows: (1) support of a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 7 8 (2) Plaintiffs may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in opposition to ACCJC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 9 10 ACCJC may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in (3) ACCJC may file a reply memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 20 11 pages in further support of its motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 12 Complaint. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THORUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 14 15 KELLER, SLOAN, ROMAN & HOLLAND LLP Dated: November 8, 2016 16 By: 17 18 19 /s/ Kenneth E. Keller KENNETH E. KELLER Attorneys for Defendant Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges ALTSHULER BERZON LLP Dated: November 8, 2016 20 21 22 By: /s/ Eileen B. Goldsmith EILEEN B. GOLDSMITH Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-03411-HSG 1 CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i) ATTESTATION 2 I, Kenneth E. Keller, hereby attest that I have been authorized by Eileen B. Goldsmith, 3 counsel for Plaintiffs, to execute on her behalf this Joint Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of 4 Briefs on Defendant ACCJC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 5 Dated: November 8, 2016 6 /s/ Kenneth E. Keller Kenneth E. Keller 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-03411-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 As stipulated and agreed to by the Parties, ACCJC may file a memorandum of points and 3 authorities not to exceed 30 pages in support of a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 4 Complaint; Plaintiffs may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in 5 opposition to ACCJC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint; and ACCJC may 6 file a reply memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 20 pages in further support of its 7 motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. TE 14 Ju ER S. Gillia R NIA y wo o d d ge H a H 13 RT 12 NO 11 m Jr. A 10 IED DEN ___________________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM , JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FO Dated: November ____, 2016 10 C LI 9 UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. TA S DISTRICT RT U O 8 S 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-03411-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?