Perasso v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
Filing
31
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (pursuant to 30 stipulation). Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/17/2016. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/12/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/19/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Bench Trial set for 1/23/2017 07:30 AM before Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PATRICIA PERASSO,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. C 16-03422 WHA
v.
ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
15
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY and GROUP
LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR
EMPLOYEES OF MWH AMERICAS,
INC.,
16
Defendants.
14
/
17
18
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulated request to suspend briefing deadlines
19
because the parties “reached a settlement in principle” (Dkt. No. 30). This order extends
20
upcoming briefing deadlines by two weeks to give the parties a reasonable opportunity to
21
finalize their settlement and dismiss this action. The new deadlines are as follows:
22
•
Defendants’ lodging of administrative record: December 1
23
•
Plaintiff’s opening brief: December 1
24
•
Defendants’ opening and opposition brief: December 15
25
•
Plaintiff’s opposition and reply brief: December 29
26
•
Defendants’ reply brief: January 12, 2017
27
•
Joint final pretrial order: January 12, 2017
28
1
2
3
The final pretrial conference is continued from January 5, 2017 to JANUARY 19, 2017.
Trial is continued from January 9 to JANUARY 23, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: November 17, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?