Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Avaya Inc

Filing 19

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF ATTORNEYS CHRISTOPHER O. GREEN AND NOAH GRAUBART by Judge Alsup denying 17 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. AVAYA INC., Defendants. / 14 15 No. C 16-03459 WHA ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF ATTORNEYS CHRISTOPHER O. GREEN AND NOAH GRAUBART The pro hac vice applications of Attorney Christopher O. Green (Dkt. No. 17) and Noah 16 Graubart (Dkt. No. 18) are DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule 17 requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar 18 of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, 19 specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court 20 website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Georgia” 21 — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the 22 application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a 23 corrected form is submitted. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: July 19, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE For the Northern District of California United States District Court 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?