Harrison Benjamin Kinney v. Gavs Auto Service et al

Filing 26

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re Case No. 15-cv-3468. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/04/2016. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF SUA SPONTE Plaintiff, 14 15 No. 16-cv-3480 CRB HARRISON BENJAMIN KINNEY, REFERRAL AS TO WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED v. GAV’S AUTO SERVICE ET AL., Defendants. / Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 3-12(c) provides: “Whenever a Judge believes that a case pending before that Judge is related to another case, the Judge may refer the case to the Judge assigned to the earliest-filed case with a request that the Judge assigned to the earliest-filed case consider whether the cases are related.” After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Court believes that this case involves the same facts, the same issues, and many of the same parties as Patrick Connally v. Gav’s Auto Service et al., Case No. 15-3468. There, the Honorable Jon S. Tigar denied a motion to add Harrison Kinney as a plaintiff because he lacked standing under the ADA. Here, Defendant Joan Borgwardt moves to dismiss Kinney’s own complaint on the same grounds. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 3-12(c), this action is REFERRED to the Honorable Jon S. Tigar for a determination of whether it relates to Patrick Connally v. Gav’s Auto Service et al., Case No. 15-3468. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: October 4, 2016 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?