Lance Hall v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
Filing
43
ORDER OF DISMISSAL (pursuant to 42 stipulation) by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
BRENDAN M. KUNKLE (Cal. State Bar No. 173292)
JOHN M. SANFORD (Cal. State Bar No. 300421)
ABBEY, WEITZENBERG, WARREN & EMERY, P.C.
100 Stony Point Road, Suite 200
P.O. Box 1566
Santa Rosa, California 95402-1566
Telephone: (707) 542-5050
Facsimile: (707) 542-2589
bkunkle@abbeylaw.com
jsanford@abbeylaw.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lance Hall
7
8
13
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
W. TUCKER PAGE (Cal. State Bar No. 306728)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
tuckerpage@paulhastings.com
14
Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation
9
10
11
12
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
LANCE HALL,
20
21
22
23
No. 3:16-cv-03504-WHA (JCS)
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
Judge:
Dept.:
Hon. William Alsup
8
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
May 24, 2016
September 25, 2017
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 3:15-cv-03504-WHA (JCS)
LEGAL_US_W # 88009611.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side
3
4
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Dated:
December 12, 2016
.
William Alsup
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 3:15-cv-03504-WHA (JCS)
LEGAL_US_W # 88009611.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?