Padilla v. 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #11 MOTION FOR EXTENSION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

DANIEL PADILLA, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16
17

No. C 16-03711 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

v.
21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF
CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL
CORPORATION; 21ST CENTURY
ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.; and
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendant.
/

18
19

The Court is in receipt of defendants’ motion for an extension to respond to plaintiff’s

20

complaint until thirty days after a ruling on the motion to transfer. Defendants’ deadline for

21

responding to plaintiff’s complaint is on July 29, 2016. This motion should have been made

22

sooner. Regardless of whether the case is transferred, defendants will eventually need to

23

respond to plaintiff’s complaint. There will be no waste in beginning that work. Given that the

24

deadline is in less than a week, however, this order grants an additional two weeks for

25

defendants to respond to plaintiff’s complaint. It is unwarranted to postpone work that will

26
27
28

1

eventually need to be done. Defendants shall therefore respond to plaintiff’s complaint by

2

August 12, 2016.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: July 28, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2