C.R. et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by C.R., I.R., J.R., Debra Moore, R.R. filed by Debra Moore, I.R., R.R., C.R., J.R. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 23, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2016)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-03742-JST Document 20 Filed 09/21/16 Page 1 of 1 I Reset Ponn I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOR1HERN DISlRICT OF CALIFORNIA C.R., co-successor-in-interest to Dejt, CASE No C16-03742 JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al. Defendant( s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: CJ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ;J Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) IC Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: lvlagistratejudges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: i!dl the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) ~ other requested deadline: 150 days Date: 09/20/2016 Date: 09/20/2016 Is/ Pointer, Adante Attorney for Plaintiff Is/ Blechman, Noah Attorney for Defendant XXCl X IT IS SO ORDERED PrintFomn Cl IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: September 23, 2016 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR " Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?