C.R. et al v. City of Antioch et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by C.R., I.R., J.R., Debra Moore, R.R. filed by Debra Moore, I.R., R.R., C.R., J.R. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 23, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2016)
Case 3:16-cv-03742-JST Document 20 Filed 09/21/16 Page 1 of 1
I Reset Ponn I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NOR1HERN DISlRICT OF CALIFORNIA
C.R., co-successor-in-interest to Dejt,
CASE No C16-03742 JST
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.
Defendant( s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
CJ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
;J Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
IC Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Note: lvlagistratejudges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
i!dl the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
~ other requested deadline: 150 days
Date: 09/20/2016
Date: 09/20/2016
Is/ Pointer, Adante
Attorney for Plaintiff
Is/ Blechman, Noah
Attorney for Defendant
XXCl
X IT IS SO ORDERED
PrintFomn
Cl IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: September 23, 2016
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting
Private ADR "
Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?