C.R. et al v. City of Antioch et al
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Deadline to Request Leave to Amend to Add Defendants filed by Beverly McIntosh, Debra Moore, I.R., R.R., C.R., J.R. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 28, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
11
C.R., co-successor-in-interest to Decedent
Rakeem Rucks, by and through his
Guardian Ad Litem Beverly McIntosh; I.R.,
co-successor-in-interest to Decedent
Rakeem Rucks, by and through her
Guardian Ad Litem Beverly McIntosh;
R.R., co-successor-in-interest, by and
through her Guardian Ad Litem Beverly
McIntosh; J.R., by and through her
Guardian Ad Litem Jasmine Williams; and
Debra Moore, individually,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
Case No.: 3:16-cv-03742
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE TO REQUEST LEAVE TO
AMEND TO ADD DEFENDANTS
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
CITY OF ANTIOCH, a municipal
corporation; RICK SMITH, individually
and in his official capacity as a police
sergeant for the CITY OF ANTIOCH;
CHRIS KIDD, individually and in his
official capacity as police officer for the
CITY OF ANTIOCH; CASEY
BROGDEN, individually and in his official
capacity as police officer for the CITY OF
ANTIOCH; THOMAS SMITH,
individually and in his official capacity as
police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH;
BRIAN ROSE, individually and in his
official capacity of Police Detective with
the CITY OF ANTIOCH; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive, individually, jointly and
severally.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
22
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER
24 Good cause being found, COURT ORDERS the following changes:
25 Deadline to request leave to amend complaint to identify defendants 01/22/2017
26
27
Dated: December 28, 2016
__________________________________________
HONORABLE JUDGE JON S. TIGAR
PG. 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?