C.R. et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 75

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 73 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing The Pretrial Conference One Week to February 15, 2019 filed by Casey Brogden, Rick Smith, Chris Kidd, City of Antioch. Pretrial Conference Statement due by 2/5/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 2/15/2019 at 2:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 20, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) noah.blechman@mcnamaralaw.com CAMEREN N. RIPOLI (State Bar No. 318045) cameren.ripoli@mcnamaralaw.com MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 250 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 939-5330 Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 6 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH; RICK SMITH; CHRIS KIDD; and CASEY BROGDEN 8 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C.R., co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Rakeem Rucks, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Beverly McIntosh; I.R., co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Rakeem Rucks, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Beverly McIntosh; R.R., co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Rakeem Rucks, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Beverly McIntosh; J.R., co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Rakeem Rucks, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Jasmine Williams; and Debra Moore, individually, Case No. C16-03742 JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ONE WEEK TO FEBRUARY 15, 2019 PTC Date: Trial Date: February 8, 2019 March 4, 2019 19 Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS the Court has scheduled the Pretrial Conference in this matter for February 8, 2019, with the trial date set for March 4, 2019 (ECF 64). STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE C16-03742 JST 1 2 WHEREAS the parties have agreed to and the Court has ordered that the parties attend a Settlement Conference with Judge Corley and that is now set for January 14, 2019 (ECF 72). required to meet and confer regarding the preparation of the joint pretrial statement, preparation 5 and exchange of pretrial materials, exchange propose exhibits and be well underway in terms of 6 the documents to be served, lodged and filed pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(3), and the narrowing of 7 contested issues, among the other requirements of the Court per Your Honor’s Standing Order for 8 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 WHEREAS per the current Pretrial Conference date, by January 18, 2019, the parties are 4 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 3 Civil Jury Trials. Motions in limine are due filed by January 27th and jury materials and the Joint 9 Pretrial Statement are due by January 29th. The pretrial preparation in this wrongful death case will 10 be extensive. 11 WHEREAS in light of the fact that this matter is set for a Settlement Conference on January 12 14th, the parties seek a one week continuance of the Pretrial Conference, from Febraury 8th to 13 February 15th, which will also lead to a one week extension of the pretrial filings. This will give 14 the parties, including the public entity Defendants, a chance to resolve this matter prior to 15 performing the bulk of the pretrial work prior to the Settlement Conference. 16 WHEREAS, in addition, from January 30th through February 2nd of 2019, all defense 17 counsel will be in San Antonio, Texas attending the Defense Research Institute’s annual Civil 18 Rights and Government Liability Seminar, right in the middle of the current pretrial deadlines. 19 WHEREAS both parties agree that a one week extension of the Pretrial Conference would 20 give the parties adequate time to prepare for and organize the extensive pretrial documents in this 21 matter, if this matter does not resolve at the Settlement Conference. 22 WHEREAS the trial date of March 4, 2019, will not be changed. 23 WHEREFORE good cause has been shown to continue the Pretrial Conference from 24 February 8th to Friday, February 15, 2019, at 2 pm in Oakland (1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 25 94612) 26 27 We hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE C16-03742 JST 2 1 Dated: December 18, 2018 2 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS By: _/s/ Nold, Melissa___ John L. Burris Adante D. Pointer Melissa C. Nold Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 4 5 6 Dated: December 18, 2018 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP By: 8 9 /s/ Blechman, Noah Noah G. Blechman Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH; RICK SMITH; CHRIS KIDD; and CASEY BROGDEN 10 11 12 13 ORDER 14 15 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 16 The Scheduling Order (ECF No. 64) is revised as follows: The pretrial conference is reset 17 to February 15, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. The joint pretrial conference statement is due by February 5, 18 2019. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. December 20, 2018 Dated: _________________ 22 23 By:_________________________ Hon. Jon S. Tigar District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE C16-03742 JST 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?