Porter-Burns v. Arrowood Indemnity Company, et al
Filing
29
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/24/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ARTHELLE PORTER-BURNS,
Case No. 16-cv-03756-RS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT
9
10
ARROWPOINT CAPITAL, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Plaintiff moved to strike defenses in defendants’ answer. In addition to filing opposition,
14
defendants filed an amended answer. The motion to strike is therefore denied as moot, without
15
prejudice to any arguments plaintiff may choose to advance that the answer as amended remains
16
defective. The hearing set for November 3, 2016, is vacated.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 24, 2016
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?