Porter-Burns v. Arrowood Indemnity Company, et al

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/24/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARTHELLE PORTER-BURNS, Case No. 16-cv-03756-RS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT 9 10 ARROWPOINT CAPITAL, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintiff moved to strike defenses in defendants’ answer. In addition to filing opposition, 14 defendants filed an amended answer. The motion to strike is therefore denied as moot, without 15 prejudice to any arguments plaintiff may choose to advance that the answer as amended remains 16 defective. The hearing set for November 3, 2016, is vacated. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 24, 2016 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?