Porter-Burns v. Arrowood Indemnity Company, et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend the Date to Complete the Early Neutral Evaluation Hearing. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/10/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION 11 ARTHELLE PORTER-BURNS, Case No.: 3:16-cv-03756-RS 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation wholly-owned subsidiary of ARROWPOINT CAPITAL, NELSON & KENNARD, ROBERT SCOTT KENNARD, individually and in his official capacity, JAMIE ALLISON FORBES and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, [PROPOSED ORDER] RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DATE TO COMPLETE THE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION HEARING 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 Pursuant to the Stipulation between Plaintiff, ARTHELLE PORTER- 26 BURNS and Defendants, ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, 27 ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORP. (erroneously sued as “ARROWPOINT 28 CAPITAL”), NELSON & KENNARD, ROBERT SCOTT KENNARD, and 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DATE TO COMPLETE THE ENE HEARING Case No: 3:16-cv-03756-RS 1 JAMIE ALLISON FORBES (“Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants are 2 collectively referred to as “Parties”) to extend the date to complete the Early 3 Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) hearing and for Good Cause, the Court orders as 4 follows: 5 It is agreed by and between the Parties that the ENE hearing shall be 6 conducted on March 22, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. at Morrison & Foerster, 425 Market 7 Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 DATED: 1/10/17 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DATE TO COMPLETE THE ENE HEARING Case No: 3:16-cv-03756-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?