Ryan Muehe v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 41 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, to Strike Class Allegations filed by Ryan Muehe. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 10, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2017)

Download PDF
4 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996) 1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 ltfisher@bursor.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, LLP Spencer M. Schulz 3850 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 200 Metairie, LA 70002 Telephone: (504) 828-3700 Email: sschulz@sessions.legal 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 RYAN MUEHE, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated, 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 16-cv-03764-JST STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Hon. Jon S. Tigar Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 16-CV-03764-JST 1 2 Plaintiff Ryan Muehe (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. (“Defendant”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RECITALS 1. motion noticed a hearing date of February 2, 2017. 2. Plaintiff intends to oppose Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 3. The parties agree that additional time will assist the parties in fully briefing the issues set forth in Defendant’s motion. 4. 13 14 15 The parties have met and conferred and agreed upon a modified hearing date and briefing schedule. 11 12 On December 29, 2016, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The STIPULATION 1. Plaintiffs will file their opposition on January 26, 2017. 2. Defendant will file its reply on February 9, 2017. 3. The hearing on Defendant’s motion will take place on February 23, 2017, or at such other time that is convenient for the Court. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 16-CV-03764-JST 1 1 2 DATED: January 10, 2017 3 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 4 By: /s/ Annick M. Persinger Annick M. Persinger 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: January 10, 2017 SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, LLP By: /s/ Spencer M. Schulz Spencer M. Schulz Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Annick M. Persinger, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the stipulation’s content and have authorized the stipulation. /s/ Annick M. Persinger Annick M. Persinger 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 16-CV-03764-JST 2 1 PROPOSED ORDER 2 3 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation to Set Briefing Date and Hearing 4 Schedule for Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Court, having considered the 5 parties’ stipulation, finds good cause in support thereof. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 7 1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition on January 26, 2017. 8 2. Defendant shall file its reply on February 9, 2017. 9 3. February 23, 2017 The hearing on Defendant’s motion will take place on _____________________. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 January 10, 2017 DATED: ____________________ ____________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 16-CV-03764-JST 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?