Henley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/23/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 VINCENT CASTILLO, SBN 209298 vcastillo@llcllp.com MARIA M. LAMPASONA, SBN 259675 mlampasona@llcllp.com ALEXEI N. OFFILL-KLEIN, SBN 288448 aoffillklein@llcllp.com LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 Telephone: (510) 433-2600 Facsimile: (510) 433-2699 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CHARLES HENLEY, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. Case No. 3:16-cv-03767-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant. Complaint Filed: Trial Date: 17 July 5, 2016 February 15, 2018 18 19 20 Plaintiff Charles Henley and defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company submit the 21 following stipulation to modify the Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. 24). RECITALS 22 23 On October 27, 2017, the Court issued a Case Management Scheduling Order with respect 24 to all relevant pre-trial and trial dates. With regard to a settlement conference, the Court referred 25 the parties to Judge Westmore, per the parties’ request, “for the purposes of engaging in a 26 settlement conference to take place, ideally, within the next 120 days.” (Dkt. 24, 1:17-19.) 27 28 On November 19, 2016, following a pre-settlement telephone conference between the parties and Judge Westmore, the Court scheduled the settlement conference for February 8, 2017. 31039-45394 AOFFILLKLEIN 680009.1 1 STIP. AND [PROPOPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MGMT. SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03767-RS 1 (Dkt. 28.) 2 The parties have conferred and agree that the settlement conference, as currently 3 scheduled, is premature for the following reasons. The parties wish to complete additional 4 discovery, including plaintiff’s deposition, which is tentatively scheduled to take place on 5 February 16, 2017, prior to the settlement conference. Counsel for both parties have spent 6 significant time recently in trial, and preparing for trial, in other matters. The parties believe that 7 the additional time to complete essential discovery will permit the parties to engage in a more 8 meaningful dialogue at the conference. Subject to the Court’s approval and availability, the parties are currently contemplating 10 Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 9 that a continued settlement conference will take place the third week of March (March 20-24) or 11 the second week of April (April 10-14). These changes will not affect the trial date or any other 12 pretrial deadlines. The parties have not previously requested a modification of the Case 13 Management Scheduling Order. For the Court’s reference, on January 17, 2017, the parties submitted to Judge Westmore a 14 15 request to continue the settlement conference, but were told to first request the continuance from 16 Judge Seeborg’s department due to the Scheduling Order’s mandate that the settlement 17 conference occur within 120 days of October 27, 2017. 18 STIPULATION 19 NOW, THEREFORE, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, 20 The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby request the following modifications 21 to the Case Management Scheduling Order: 22 With respect to Alternative Dispute Resolution (Paragraph 1), the parties request that the 23 deadline to engage in a settlement conference with Judge Westmore be extended to May 26, 24 2017.1 25 26 27 28 1 The extra time is requested in an abundance of caution because the parties do not know Judge Westmore’s availability. 31039-45394 AOFFILLKLEIN 680009.1 2 STIP. AND [PROPOPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MGMT. SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03767-RS 1 Dated: January 23, 2017 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 6 /s/ Alexei N. Offill-Klein VINCENT CASTILLO MARIA M. LAMPASONA ALEXEI N. OFFILL-KLEIN Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 7 8 Dated: January 23, 2017 HILDEBRAND MCLEOD & NELSON, LLP By: 10 Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 9 11 12 /s/ Paula Rasmussen PAULA RASMUSSEN ANTHONY PETRU EDDY MACLEOD Attorneys for Plaintiff CHARLES HENLEY 13 14 ORDER 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 DATED: 18 1/23/17 ____________________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 31039-45394 AOFFILLKLEIN 680009.1 3 STIP. AND [PROPOPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MGMT. SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO. 3:16-CV-03767-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?